Video
macOS Sonoma - 17 Settings You NEED to Change Immediately!Chromium browser vs Safari -
Retrieved 8 January Retrieved 5 November Flow's goal is to render every website correctly but there is currently a long way left to go. Retrieved 3 May Retrieved 11 May Retrieved 7 February Please note that we're still early in development, and many web platform features are missing or broken.
It's going to take a long time before Ladybird is ready for day-to-day browsing. This project does not cater to non-technical users.
Retrieved 5 May Removed for KF6, the 'kf5' branch contains the last maintained state. April Retrieved 4 May The Register. Retrieved 7 August Browser engines.
Blink Gecko Goanna WebKit. EdgeHTML Flow MSHTML NetSurf Presto Servo. KHTML Mariner Tasman Tkhtml. Categories : Layout engines Web browser comparisons.
Hidden categories: Articles with short description Short description is different from Wikidata. Toggle limited content width. GNU LGPL , BSD-style. Safari browser, plus all browsers for iOS ; [3] GNOME Web , Konqueror. Google Chrome and all other Chromium -based browsers, notably Microsoft Edge , Brave , Vivaldi , Samsung Internet and Opera [4].
Mozilla Public. Firefox browser and Thunderbird email client. Straver [6]. Pale Moon , Basilisk and K-Meleon browsers. some UWP apps ; [8] formerly in the Edge browser [9]. server-side for low-end phones; [d] formerly in the Opera browser. Flow browser [15]. experimental browsers [16] [17].
hobbyists [20]. GNU GPLv2. NetSurf browser [21]. hobbyists [23]. Ladybird browser [22]. GNU LGPL. formerly in the Konqueror browser [25]. Forums Software Mac Apps. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. OddMacFan macrumors member Original poster. Jan 21, 34 I'm running Safari and Edge latest versions of both on a MBP In my opinion, Edge seems slightly faster for general browsing, but the UI especially settings, contextual menus, print dialog is horribly ugly due to its non-native UI elements, and I've had some formatting issues when printing from Edge even via the system dialog, which doesn't show the normal preview.
On Safari, I've had occasional quirks where pages would load, briefly flash the contents in the window, and then the window would go blank all white and the page never does display so that it's usable. With respect to YouTube: When I clear all cache and history from both browsers, load youtube.
com, and then search for a channel, I almost always get better results in Edge. Most often, the channel itself will pop up as the top hit, whereas on Safari, top hits are usually some videos from the channel or even videos from other channels vaguely matching the search, and have to scroll down the page to find the actual channel.
When I play videos from a particular channel, Edge's standard in-browser window is both larger and will often auto-negotiate a higher resolution i.
Auto p, Auto p than Safari--of course, I can change the playback resolution manually in Safari, but it often auto-negotiates lower. I assume the YouTube behavior is because Google's Chromium works better with Google's YouTube, but is this the bottom line or is there something I can do to get Safari to duplicate this behavior?
Feb 10, 6, 8, USA. That's interesting. I'm no expert so please someone correct me but the search on a web page is being done by the website and not the browser. That would mean Google is giving preference to it's own browser. They've done stuff when it was old Edge to slow down loading of their websites so this would not surprise me at all.
It's Google. That's the reason I would never put Chrome on my Mac but I know lot's of people love it. Click to expand mk macrumors Feb 6, 1, 1, With regards to the search results, do you have any of the 'Smart Search; fields selected in Safari preferences.
IT sounds like Safari might be using Preload Top Hit in the background or Include Safari Suggestions' that would give you different search results.
Non-stimulant energy boosters may earn a small commission from Chromium browser vs Safari purchases Chromium browser vs Safari through our site. However, Chormium earnings do beowser affect how we review services. Learn more about our editorial integrity and research process. With applications available for the Google Chrome browser on both Apple desktops and iOS, you might be wondering if you should make the switch. Cloudwards completed a fresh comparison of Safari vs Chrome.
Chromium browser vs Safari -
Search Advanced search…. Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. Search Advanced…. Home New Posts Forum List Trending New Threads New Media Spy. New posts.
WikiPost Latest summaries Watched WikiPosts. Support FAQ and Rules Contact Us. Install the app. Safari vs. Thread starter OddMacFan Start date Aug 23, Sort by reaction score. Forums Software Mac Apps. JavaScript is disabled.
For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
OddMacFan macrumors member Original poster. Jan 21, 34 I'm running Safari and Edge latest versions of both on a MBP This is actually kind of like old IE code for the web.
They did that because IE was bundled with the OS, and it was therefore a dominant browser. The same thing is functionally true with Safari.
Not the case with iOS Safari. Allowing true browser competition would be a good first step toward making Safari better if Apple really wants to double down on that , or letting the market sort things out with alternative browsers. Your sample is obviously very small. Yes, I know it uses WebKit.
is absolutely true. that they should do something different. Case in point. My dad is very much a regular, non-technical user - but he insists on Chrome because once he had a glitch with Safari, and I suggested that he try Chrome for that website as it might work better.
Since then he just decided that Chrome is what he uses now, because why should he use two browsers? No joke. Now back to iOS. But give it several years, and I predict that there would be a rather sharp uptick in alternative browser usage. Not because the average person is desperate to download Chrome, but because the few people that the average person takes advice from will suggest they move in that direction as they hit edge cases.
LMS platforms will suggest it. Their tech-savvy friends will suggest it. Banks will suggest their own apps every day of the week just because their customers are using a more controlled environment without plugins.
Having two browsers with separate bookmarks makes no sense at all. Almost all of them use Macs, and I am often helping them and seeing their laptops. They also use the Google office suite extensively, which performs poorly on Safari.
I use Safari, even though I have a choice, because of the battery life and autofill feature with text messages. Interesting observations to be sure.
I am curious. Do the problems arise because Safari WebKit holds to more rigorous standards, thereby requiring a higher effort to develop certain operations?
Or does Safari WebKit have fewer features, thereby limiting what can be developed within it? Or do other browsers break out of the supposedly accepted standards, thereby allowing them to offer more than Safari WebKit?
When browser engineers add new features or support new APIs, they often do so through rendering engine code additions, as can be seen from various Blink enhancements.
Sometimes Apple, Google, and Firefox agree on new features and work together and fix the issue, as with popover menus. Other times, the browser makers disagree and sulk as their codebases diverge. Safari developed a reputation for lagging behind Chrome and Firefox.
Apple, however, appears to be aware of the risk posed by regulators and has added more staff to the WebKit team to close the capabilities gap.
If Apple does allow other browser engines within iOS ecosystem, Google and Mozilla will be able to compete with Safari through technical differentiation that's already evident in the desktop versions of these browsers. Open Web Advocacy, a developer lobbying group, last year issued a Walled Gardens report elaborating on the consequences of Apple's WebKit requirement.
It described Apple's restrictions as anticompetitive self-preferencing. While the requested Firefox for iOS settings page for toggling GeckoView could be for internal browser testing, it appears to be something more.
The brief public discussion of the GitHub issue suggests Mozilla has anticipated that Apple's rules may change — something sought by Mozilla and others through ongoing regulatory lobbying. Asked on December 12 by an open source contributor what release this is for, Laurie Marceau, senior software Developer at Mozilla, answered that it's "for a secondary project not in this repository.
The open source contributor then replies , "Thanks, can't wait until [the] EU clarifies [the] situation and we can have proper Gecko Firefox on iOS. Marceau responds with a thumbs-up emoji. We asked Marceau to elaborate but we've not heard back. Mozilla did not immediately respond but said it might have something to say later.
We will update this story if so. On December 13 last year, it was reported that Apple was preparing to allow third-party app stores in iOS 17 — expected in Q3 — to comply with the European Digital Markets Act.
Those rules — and related concerns raised by other regulators — look likely to force Apple to drop its iOS WebKit requirement. Apple, however, has made no public commitment to that effect and did not respond to The Register 's request for comment.
This is not the first time Mozilla has prepared a Gecko-based version of Firefox for iOS. Ted Mielczarek, a former platform engineer at Mozilla, noted via Twitter that he has twice before been involved in Gecko ports to iOS, in and Mozilla never forced the issue by asking a court to force Apple to distribute Gecko-based Firefox on iOS — a costly battle it might not win.
But recently it showed public concern about the anticompetitive consequences of Apple's WebKit rule in a September report titled "Five Walled Gardens: Why Browsers are Essential to the Internet and How Operating Systems Are Holding Them Back.
If the EU Digital Markets act has the effect that has been predicted, there will be fewer walled gardens by the end of the year.
But based on past experience don't hold your breath. In an emailed statement, a Mozilla spokesperson said, "We abide by Apple's iOS app store policies, and are simply doing some exploratory work to understand the technical challenges for Gecko-based browsers on iOS if those policies were to change.
We hope the day will come when people can freely decide to use the browser of their choice, including the opportunity to select the engine that underpins it. The Register Biting the hand that feeds IT. Review and manage your consent Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them.
Manage Cookie Preferences Necessary. Always active Read more These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features.
Security Security. All Security Cyber-crime Patches Research CSO X. Off-Prem Off-Prem.
Natural and organic energy boosters has 30 reviews and a rating of Chromuum. Compare Excess subcutaneous fat similarities and differences between software options with real user reviews focused Chhromium features, Excess subcutaneous fat of use, customer service, and value for money. Reviews are generated by real users. The top products based on usability and customer satisfaction, as rated by user reviews. Check out our full methodology description for more detail. Our industry-specific advisors recommend products based on specific business needs.
Ich hörte darüber nichts noch