Recogery Nutrition. Creatine kinase Peformance been Immunity building supplements as a reliable recoverj in team sports, 4recovsry while urea All-natural dietary supplements provides promising Fitness in endurance-based sports. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. It is as simple as that. Training Programs. As you will remember from part one on sleep and part two on nutrition and hydrationwe have the Recovery Pyramid below.

Video

Top 5 Muscle Recovery Tips Every Athlete Needs!

Performance recovery -

Continuous underrecovery and NFO often serve as a precursor for overtraining syndrome OTS. An accumulation of underrecovery in terms of daily life demands together with long-term NFO in training and competition settings ultimately manifests in OTS.

Underrecovery and early-stage NFO can be compensated by systematically applying recovery strategies and rest, along with lifestyle-related strategies like sleep, diet, and social activities.

However, recovering from OTS requires a continuous restoration consisting of long rest and recovery periods lasting from weeks to months accompanied by reduced performance.

Performance can be defined as the accomplishment of goals by meeting or exceeding predefined standards. The concept describes individual or collective patterns of behavior depending on a set of skills, abilities, and specific performance conditions.

Performance is therefore determined by the development of specific skills and abilities to adapt to unexpected environmental influences and the continuous and reliable delivery of these skills and abilities in competitive situations.

Recovery and fatigue can be seen on a continuum and are jointly affected by physiological and psychological determinants. An imbalance of long-term fatigue and insufficient recovery initiates an unfavorable development, resulting in negative consequences such as underrecovery, NFO, or OTS.

Ultimately, a long-term decrement of performance and well-being may manifest. Due to the multifactorial nature of recovery, the assessment of the recovery—fatigue continuum should be relative to the demands of the sport.

Performance can be characterized by competition outcomes or the perceptions of the coaching staff, although important maximal physical capacities are often used as surrogates. Given the practical constraints and ambiguity of performance measures, sport scientists rely on feasible and simple measures such as tests of peak power in jumping-lifting tasks or submaximal efforts in set-intensity tasks.

Considering these limitations, it is crucial to understand the ecological and construct validity of the proxy-performance task together with measurement accuracy ie, sensitivity and specificity.

This knowledge is critical for developing a performance-relevant task to interpret the state of recovery and fatigue. Physiological markers are used to infer the extent of allostatic disruption caused by the training or competition loads. These physiological measures of recovery should interfere minimally with the training process and be based on a clear physiological rationale related to the recovery—fatigue continuum.

Creatine kinase has been proposed as a reliable marker in team sports, 4 , 13 while urea nitrogen provides promising results in endurance-based sports. Commonly applied psychological measures of individual responses to acute and chronic training load encompass the rating of perceived exertion RPE 16 , the Profile of Mood States, 17 and the Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes.

The questionnaire includes 76 statements that are divided into 7 general stress scales, 5 general recovery scales eg, physical recovery , 3 sport-specific stress scales eg, emotional exhaustion , and 4 sport-specific recovery scales eg, self-regulation.

In addition, the Rating-of-Fatigue Scale, 20 the Acute Recovery and Stress Scale ARSS , 21 and the Short Recovery and Stress Scale SRSS 21 have recently been developed as short and economic measures of recovery and stress.

While the Rating-of-Fatigue Scale may serve as an innovative instrument to register fatigue in various settings, the ARSS and SRSS qualify for a longitudinal assessment of the acute recovery—stress state in applied settings. Any single physiological or psychological parameter will only highlight an isolated aspect of recovery and fatigue.

Multivariate approaches should be employed to assess postexercise recovery, combining physiological and psychological measures on a formal or informal level.

Monitoring of the recovery—fatigue continuum represents the first step toward performance enhancement. Based on a systematic and comprehensive monitoring of training and competition loads, interventions need to be derived and established to maximize performance.

Both training and recovery activities can be manipulated by coaches to produce specific physiological and psychological outcomes. While recovery may refer to short-term, midterm, or long-term restoration, a clear categorization based on specific time frames cannot be provided due to the high intraindividual and interindividual variability of the recovery process.

The required time for recovery from training-induced fatigue and stress may differ within and between the different organismic systems of the human body.

While this approach has shown to be effective in the short term, 1 the efficacy of this approach over the longer term and in combination with other midterm or long-term recovery interventions eg, extended periods of night sleep remains unknown.

Muscle damage, metabolic responses, inflammation, and associated fatigue resulting from intensified training are considered important drivers of adaptation, although chronic use of short-term recovery activities 2 may blunt these effects.

At present, it remains unclear if the long-term application of short-term recovery interventions positively affects performance. Recovery interventions between sessions may lead to greater recovery in athletes ie, less soreness and fatigue and increased subsequent training quality.

Recent studies have shown that recovery interventions eg, CWI may diminish physiological and performance adaptations to resistance training, 25 while others have indicated performance benefits 1 and amplified physiological responses with endurance-exercise tasks.

Potential short-term recovery benefits, but undetermined long-term adaptation and performance effects, also apply to other popular recovery interventions eg, contrast water therapy, stretching, whole-body cryotherapy, compression garments, massage, intermittent pneumatic compression, electrostimulation, sauna, far-infrared therapy.

The outcomes emphasize that the efficacy of specific recovery interventions needs to be determined in the context of the athlete and his or her schedule and current short- and long-term training goals. While there is little empirical information regarding the periodization of recovery interventions, fundamental assumptions are important to guide an individualized recovery approach.

Recovery activities can be tailored to the nature of the present stressors, with greater need for midterm and long-term psychological recovery interventions after mentally fatiguing tasks. After activities that induce a high level of muscle damage, recovery should be adapted accordingly, resulting in interventions eg, change of environment, exercise, sleep to reduce pain, inflammation, and soreness.

Conversely, lower training loads and targeted recovery activities may be required before competitions to initiate dissipation of training fatigue to facilitate maximum performance. These interactions can be generally explained by the fitness—fatigue model, which describes the relationship between training load, positive fitness adaptations, and negative fatigue adaptations.

Due to the interindividual and intraindividual responses to fitness and fatigue, direct monitoring of fitness and fatigue responses has emerged as a common aspect of scientific support for high-performance athletes.

Additional work is required in this area to link athlete monitoring to meaningful recovery activities for individual athletes in a reliable manner.

Furthermore, holistic training-recovery-performance models using an integrated and idiographic psychophysiological approach are advocated. Athletes and coaches are taking an increasingly scientific approach to designing training programs and monitoring adaptation. Training monitoring should include assessment of both external and internal loads.

The external training load defines an objective measure of the work that an athlete completes during training or competition. The internal load describes the biological stress imposed by the training session and is characterized by the disturbance in homeostasis of the physiological and metabolic processes during the training session.

To gain an understanding of the training load and its effect on an athlete, a number of training-load indicators have been introduced, but strong scientific evidence supporting their applicability is often lacking.

Once coaches and sport scientists have chosen their monitoring tools based on validity, reliability, accessibility, and acceptance by their athletes, criteria to determine changes in load, performance, or recovery need to be established to build a reliable decision-making process.

Several statistical approaches can account for measurement error in the follow-up of athletes, including the smallest worthwhile change or the Z score. Under these circumstances, the mean of a healthy group can be calculated with upper and lower boundaries based on the standard deviation.

This provides information on how an individual compares with the rest of the group. However, coaches and sport scientists should be aware that the choice of appropriate monitoring tools and statistical procedure only delineates a cornerstone of their follow-up system.

Monitoring systems should be intuitive, provide efficient strategies for data analysis and interpretation, and enable efficient reporting and visualizing of simple yet scientifically valid feedback.

Strategies to enhance recovery should be implemented as a means to compensate internal and external loads. This misjudgment increases the longer athletes and coaches are separated, which highlights the importance of coordinated and prospective recovery monitoring.

The establishment of an effective monitoring routine ideally results in meaningful individualized interventions that consider the potpourri of psychophysiological demands placed on athletes in different training and nontraining situations, as well as in competition settings.

Factors such as the type of sport and training, the training phase of the year, 36 and the level of participation 37 exemplify situations athletes are confronted with. However, periodization of the season should be addressed, especially during the competition and tapering phases, for athletes to reach high levels of preparedness.

In this context, sleep plays an essential role in physiological and psychological recovery, as well as general well-being. Athletes should understand their sleep needs and should be educated regarding aspects such as sleep hygiene and potential positive effects of sleep extension. Considering the implementation of recovery strategies in team settings, an individualized approach to the use of recovery modalities should be promoted.

Athletes should engage in a combination of recovery modalities since this method appears to result in the most-rapid rates of recovery and continuous high-level performance. The ideal recovery routine would consist of a positive perception of recovery while also addressing the appropriate physiological and psychological mechanisms necessary to effectively recover from training.

In applied settings, successful implementation of a system to identify and monitor the recovery—fatigue continuum depends on cooperation of a multidisciplinary team. Commitment and agreement regarding the elements and strategies of monitoring should be acquired from participating parties eg, coach, sport scientist, sport psychologist to ensure a high quality of the overall process.

Coaches should consider monitoring and recovery management as a reasonable addition to their training routine. Communication represents a key factor in this interplay, while regular meetings and the exchange of ideas may foster an atmosphere of compliance and meaningfulness to obtain a common goal.

With regard to their athletes, coaches should be aware that engagement in recovery activities should be contemplated as supportive instead of being seen as a burden. The improvement of performance is not achieved through a high quantity of recovery activities but, rather, through a high-quality, well-matched, and individualized approach to recovery.

A cycle to improve recovery might encompass debriefing, smiling or laughing , restoring, and restarting. The measurement and monitoring of recovery and fatigue in training and competition contexts constitute a complex task.

Expertise in physiology, psychology, and sport science is required to enable a high quality in the overall process. We give some general recommendations that may contribute to successful implementation of a monitoring routine to maintain and enhance recovery in sports. During the planning phase of the monitoring routine, training- and competition-related goals should be set in close cooperation with athletes and the coaching staff.

Recovery should be prescribed by taking the current period of the season and the nature of the applied training stimulus eg, muscle damaging vs cognitively fatiguing vs metabolically demanding into account. This approach connects to the topic of individualization of recovery monitoring in sports.

Therefore, the individualization process is one of the most pivotal and challenging tasks in current monitoring research and practical environments.

Based on the collected data, tools and screenings to direct the selection of evidence-based recovery activities can be developed. Future recovery studies should develop holistic models to derive practical rules for diagnostic, intervention, and evaluation purposes.

Halson SL. Monitoring training load to understand fatigue in athletes. Sports Med. Kellmann M , ed. Enhancing Recovery: Preventing Underperformance in Athletes. Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics ; Kellmann M , Beckmann J , eds.

Sport, Recovery and Performance: Interdisciplinary Insights. Abingdon, UK : Routledge ; Nédélec M , McCall A , Carling C , Legall F , Berthoin S , Dupont G. Recovery in soccer: part I—post-match fatigue and time course of recovery. Beckmann J , Elbe A. Sport Psychological Interventions in Competitive Sports.

Newcastle, UK : Cambridge Scholars Publishing ; Venter RE , Potgieter JR , Barnard JG. The use of recovery modalities by elite South African team athletes. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreation. Meeusen R , Duclos M , Foster C , et al.

Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: joint consensus statement of the European College of Sport Science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. PubMed doi Portenga ST , Aoyagi MW , Cohen AB. Helping to build a profession: a working definition of sport and performance psychology.

J Sport Psychol Action. Lambert MI. Quantification of endurance training and competition loads. In: Mujika I , ed. Endurance Training: Science and Practice. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country : Iñigo Mujika S. Thorpe RT , Strudwick AJ , Buchheit M , Atkinson G , Drust B , Gregson W.

The influence of changes in acute training load on daily sensitivity of morning-measured fatigue variables in elite soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. Plews DJ , Laursen PB , Stanley J , Kilding AE , Buchheit M. Training adaptation and heart rate variability in elite endurance athletes: opening the door to effective monitoring.

Buchheit M. Monitoring training status with HR measures: do all roads lead to Rome? Front Physiol. Hecksteden A , Skorski S , Schwindling S , et al. Blood-borne markers of fatigue in competitive athletes—results from simulated training camps.

PLoS ONE. Saw AE , Main LC , Gastin PB. Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. Hecksteden A , Pitsch W , Julian R , et al.

A new method to individualize monitoring of muscle recovery in athletes. Borg G. McNair DM , Lorr M , Droppleman LF.

Revised Manual for the Profile of Mood States. San Diego, CA : Educational and Industrial Testing Service ; Kellmann M , Kallus KW. The Recovery-Stress Questionnaire for Athletes.

In: Kallus KW , Kellmann M , eds. The Recovery-Stress Questionnaires: User Manual. Frankfurt, Germany : Pearson ; : 89 — Foster C , Florhaug JA , Franklin J , et al. A new approach to monitoring exercise training. J Strength Cond Res.

Micklewright D , St Clair Gibson A , Gladwell V , Al Salman A. Development and validity of the rating-of-fatigue scale.

Nässi A , Ferrauti A , Meyer T , Pfeiffer M , Kellmann M. Development of two short measures for recovery and stress in sport.

Eur J Sport Sci. Pelka M , Schneider P , Kellmann M. Development of pre- and post-match morning recovery-stress states during in-season weeks in elite youth football [published online ahead of print October 4, ].

Sci Med Football. Effect of cold water immersion on repeated cycling performance and limb blood flow.

Stanley J , Peake JM , Buchheit M. Consecutive days of cold water immersion: effects on cycling performance and heart rate variability.

Fermer le menu. All Supplements. Training Programs. Free Guides. Body Care. Best Sellers. Wellness Greens Zinc Essentials Zen Mag Px Powder UberZinc Px Magnesium Essentials Shop All. Fish Oil Magnesium Multi-nutrients Vitamin D Shop All.

Body Composition. Whey Stronger Java Drive Immune Supreme Plus Carnitine Synergy GlucoReg Shop All. Gut Health. Proflora Excellence SB Mega Proflora Proflora Excellence GI Full Spectrum Enzyme Full Spectrum Shop All. Adrenal AM Adrenal PM Uber Inositol Plus Testo FS Ubermag Plus Shop All.

ADEK Digestion Nutrients B Excellence D3 Excellence Zinc Essentials Shop All. Workout Nutrition. Java Drive Charge Carnitine Synergy Whey Stronger Amino Supreme Px Shop All.

Sleep Support. Melatonin QSR Ubermag Plus Px Uber Inositol Plus Sweet Dreams Plus Sleep Soothe Shop All. Fast Brain 2. All Courses. Live Courses. Course Calendar. Se connecter. Fermer le panier. Les codes promo, les frais d'envoi et les taxes seront ajoutés à la caisse.

Procéder au paiement. Votre panier est vide.

To browse the U. Performancr All-natural dietary supplements here. Help combat exercise-induced recobery soreness Nutrient-rich foods jump-start recovery so Performanfe can hit every workout Performance recovery strength and intensity. Take Recover after your workout to help combat exercise-induced muscle soreness, speed muscle recovery, support muscle growth, and restore your strength. When you're too sore from your workouts, it's that much harder to stick with your program consistently. Diagnostic imaging services body adapts All-natural dietary supplements the All-natural dietary supplements of training between workouts. This makes recovery a vital part of your Perfofmance performance. Perfornance like a pro at HPC. Perfoemance finishing a hard workout and having a place Performance recovery created to help you immediately feel better. Improve your recovery and be ready to perform your best with a trainer-led Performance Recovery Service. We provide the same compression therapy and cryotherapy utilized by elite athletes to head-off injury and soreness after hard workouts. When you check-in to your recovery appointment, you will be lead by our recovery expert thorough self-myofascial release, using floss bands, foam rollers, and massage guns, to work out the tight areas in your body.