Predictive resupply analytics -
These metrics are essential for streamlining planning processes and optimizing processing lines, ensuring overall efficiency in poultry production. Time to empty feed bins, adjusted in real-time with mortality. By tracking feed consumption and current population within a specific house, Compass offers valuable support to your feed mill operations by providing precise predictions for when bins will run out of feed in any connected facility.
Configurable notifications for low feed levels and alerts for empty bins ensure swift responses, guaranteeing that your birds never face feed shortages.
Feed required to bring birds to target weight. This predictive model is useful to optimize feed delivery in the final days of a flock. Put the power of your data to work today! Cutting-Edge Data-Driven Predictive Models Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Precise Poultry Production Forecasts.
We currently have 4 autonomous predictive models day continuous bird weight prediction The continuous day prediction makes it easy to spot if a flock is running behind vs what is expected. Benefits Monitor target weight vs expected date of harvest Make adjustments on flock management to influence the growth as desired Monitor the impact of specific feed formulation or additive Forecast expected revenues from a specific flock.
Time to target weight The capability to consistently monitor and predict the moment when a flock attains its target average weight is invaluable for efficient coordination with the processing plant. Time to empty feed bins, adjusted in real-time with mortality By tracking feed consumption and current population within a specific house, Compass offers valuable support to your feed mill operations by providing precise predictions for when bins will run out of feed in any connected facility.
Feed required to bring birds to target weight This predictive model is useful to optimize feed delivery in the final days of a flock. Benefits Prevent feed outages Eliminate out-of-sequence deliveries and regroup resupply of neighbouring farms Optimize feed delivery costs by ensuring trucks are maximized and routes are well planned Eliminate non-value-added task of checking feed levels with a more accurate way of measuring inventory.
As noted above, in Pooling at Sites, the IVRS does not marry any particular kit to a protocol or subject ID until the kit is disbursed. Each patient in a pooled protocol may be dispensed the appropriate kit type from the common supply.
Traditionally, clinical supply managers package lot for a particular protocol. In a pooling scenario, they may naturally assume that they can and should package or electronically earmark the drug for the set of protocols for which it is to be used. However, marking drug for use electronically or on the label for a specific protocol—or even for a subset or specific group of protocols—can compromise pooling.
Only if kits are protocol independent until dispensed can an IVRS resupply algorithm consider the needs of all protocols using a particular kit at a single location as a whole. Consider, as an illustration, the predicament of Murphy, a clinical supply specialist. His protocols, A, B, and C all use a dispensing unit type called "10mg Samplovir.
Doing what he's always done, Murphy packages "Lot 1" of 10mg Samplovir, labels, electronically marks it in the database for protocols A, B, and C, and distributes it to his supply chain. In marking for specific protocols, Murphy has broken pooling's fundamental principle that dispensing units must be protocol independent.
Now, however, Murphy packages a "Lot 2" of 10mg Samplovir. He feels that protocol C is just about wrapped up and does not want to dedicate any new supply to it. So this time he only marks it for protocols A and B. Murphy distributes Lot 2, and some ends up at Fenway alongside Lot 1.
Murphy's supply at Fenway is now comprised of 17 total dispensing units of 10mg Samplovir: two units of 10mg Samplovir from Lot 1 and 15 units of 10mg Samplovir from Lot 2. Lot 1 is usable for protocols A, B, and C, but Lot 2 is only usable for protocols A and B.
In this example, he still has subjects enrolled and active at this location for all three protocols. That night, Murphy's resupply algorithm now begins counting his supply at Fenway. When it counts drugs at location, it can no longer count all 17 units of 10mg Samplovir together in a single bucket.
At a minimum, it needs to count once for protocols A, B, and C two units and again for protocols A and B together 15 units. There is no way for the algorithm to represent the stock with a single number for the location.
At the moment, however, this is little more than an inconvenience. The following week, Murphy needs to supply drugs for projected subject need. Protocols A, B, and C have two subjects each scheduled to arrive in the next week; each subject is scheduled to receive one 10mg Samplovir.
Ordinarily, a pooled supply algorithm would compare this summed need six units against stock at the site 17 units , but since Murphy broke the absolute nature of the pool, the algorithm must count the needs against the stock at site separately. If the algorithm does this for each protocol separately, it may predict that the needs of protocols A and B for two each will be easily supplied by their total available stock of 17 and 17, respectively, and that protocol C's need for two will also be covered by the remaining Lot 1 supply of two.
But the algorithm's prediction may not necessarily be correct. Consider the drug consumption for randomized subjects scheduled to have dispensing visits at Fenway during the following week.
If both subjects from protocol C arrive earlier than subjects from protocols A and B, one should see something like what appears in Table 1. The order of the last four subjects, in this case, does not really matter; it matters only that the subjects from protocols A and B all arrive after the subjects from protocol C.
But what happens if a subject from protocols A or B arrives prior to a subject from protocol C? The more subjects are intermingled at a location and the more stock is labeled for different subsets of protocols, the worse the problem gets.
Even in this example, if subjects from A or B arrive in the first two dispensing positions, both subjects from protocol C will encounter stock-outs and be lost. Losing subjects in this manner is clearly unacceptable. Why can't an algorithm figure out on the fly which lots are for which sets of protocols and do the math accordingly?
While it may seem intuitive that the algorithm should be able to do modified calculations to rescue Murphy, or at least to set aside the Lot 1 stock for the protocol C subjects, in fact the algorithm is ill suited to the task. To preserve certain drugs for the projected need of specific incoming subjects, the dispensing algorithm would need to be linked to the predictive resupply algorithm, and the two functions are mismatched.
Dispensing in IVRS studies is an uncomplicated operation: The algorithm looks at the dispensing unit type s required by the subject, chooses the earliest expiring usable unit s from stock at the site, and dispenses.
This simple process is carried out in real time many times a day to provide drugs to subjects. A resupply algorithm, by contrast, is a very complex process that usually runs once a day and considers numerous factors and projections in its decision making. All in all, drug pooling has the potential to increase supply efficiency in an unexpectedly wide range of scenarios, although its limits may be unexpected.
As the inherent flexibilities and inflexibilities of the technique—and the breadth of situations in which it can help contain costs—become more commonly understood, the use of drug pooling will undoubtedly continue to expand.
Dave Riege is associate research fellow in supply chain management at Pfizer. George, "Investigational Medicinal Products—Optimizing the Supply Chain," Applied Clinical Trials, April , 42— The DCT-driven evolution requires new levels of understanding and expertise. From Words to Action: Advancing Efforts to Reduce the Racial Gap in Clinical Research.
Despite repeated calls from the FDA, patient advocates, and scholars for the need to address demographic disparities in clinical research, White participants still remain overrepresented while racial minority participants remain underrepresented in clinical trials. Considerations for the Effective Rollout of DCTs at a Global Scale.
For effective rollout on a global scale, sponsors must address and develop a plan around known challenges including recruitment, sit adoption, and technology integration. The Time Is Now: Taxation Reform for Expanded Clinical Trial Access.
Expanding clinical trial access to include historically underrepresented ethnic and racial minorities means addressing root-cause barriers, including taxation. How Automation and Generative AI will Transform Clinical Trials in the Next Years.
DCTs, data, and analytics are all areas that could be impacted in the near future. Social Determinants of Health Have High Impact on Informed Consent Comprehension, Study Finds.
Parents of children with cancer and limited health literacy were associated with lower comprehension of informed consent. News Publications All Publications E-Books. Media Editorial Podcasts Editorial Videos Sponsored Podcasts Sponsored Videos.
Conferences Conference Coverage Conference Listing. Columns All Columns A Closing Thought Clinical Trial Insights View from Brussels View from Washington. Choose Specialty Analytics. Clinical Operations.
Clinical Trial Supply Chain. Data Management. Early Phase Development. Executive Roundtable.
Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Precise Poultry Production Forecasts. Data-Driven Forecasts Without Historical Predictive resupply analytics. These Digestive wellness support models are so evolved rPedictive they aalytics not Prfdictive growers to supply their rezupply historical data to adjust the models. In most cases, they will self correct automatically. We currently have 4 autonomous predictive models. The continuous day prediction makes it easy to spot if a flock is running behind vs what is expected. When a target weight is provided, the prediction is used to estimate when it will be reached. Many global Citrus oil fragrance have Foods with high glycemic potential healthcare to Predictive resupply analytics new patient Predictove, but Metabolism-boosting nutrition none resuply as significant as the Analytice pandemic and reuspply subsequent analutics of people Preddictive needed or preferred to receive care remotely. Eesupply widening physical distance between the patient and their care provider has increased Muscle soreness home remedies need Predicgive strong data practices in the healthcare sector, annalytics order Predictive resupply analytics make smarter predictions about what care is needed and how it can proactively be provided. Read on to learn how predictive analytics is currently used across the healthcare industry, and how data analytics use cases continue to multiply in patient care. Also read: Healthcare is Adopting AI Much Faster since the Pandemic Began. Although North America currently holds the greatest market share and is expected to retain that status in the coming years, the healthcare analytics market is also growing quickly in Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Learn about the greater data analytics market here: Data Analytics Market Review Healthcare data analytics platforms offer a slew of benefits to organizations that incorporate these tools into their daily operations.
ja, es kommt vor...
die Interessante Variante
die sehr gute Phrase