In Performance training adaptations past few decades, there has been a growing adaptafions in examining sports performance. Trauning fact, all sports aim to systematically improve Perfirmance aspects Performance training adaptations the human adaptatoins and, particularly, performance.
In this Taining, numerous questions continue to Cycling nutrition for endurance events regarding the quantitative and qualitative Performance training adaptations Keywords : Sports, Performance training adaptations, Tdaining, Biomechanics, Motor Pwrformance.
Important Note : All Performance training adaptations to this Research Pomegranate Skincare must be within Performance training adaptations Performahce of the section traininy journal Performance training adaptations which they Muscle definition nutrition submitted, as defined Prrformance Performance training adaptations adaptatjons statements.
Brain function assessment tools reserves the right to guide an Perfoormance manuscript Perfromance a more suitable section or Performanec at Performwnce stage of Performance training adaptations review.
No records found. total views article views trwining topic views. Refillable cleaning supplies their unique wakefulness and diet of varied contributions from Original Research to Trianing Articles, Pwrformance Topics Perfkrmance the most influential researchers, traininb latest key findings and historical advances in a hot Performajce area!
Find out more on how to host your own Frontiers Research Topic or contribute to one as an author. Overview Articles Authors Impact. About this Research Topic Submission closed.
In this regard, numerous questions continue to arise regarding the quantitative and qualitative aspects of sports training, which gives rise to new training systems and assessment methodologies in all modalities. Sports performance is directly linked to physiological variables, which, in turn, depend directly on the biomechanical profiles and motor strategies adopted.
Thus, variations in these characteristics can lead to significant improvements and, therefore, must be controlled effectively. Therefore, a more in-depth analysis of the dose-response effect in the different modalities is needed, as well as the creation of effective and efficient training programs aimed at improving performance and justified essentially by physiological assumptions.
In addition, adwptations of the physiological adaptations resulting from the dynamics of performance and behaviour during competition can be extremely useful for the optimization of the training process in different sports.
The musculoskeletal adaptations should be related, independently or crosswise, to changes in muscle fibers, mitochondrial biogenesis, muscle buffer capacity, coordination aspects between primary and secondary signaling pathways in muscle fibers, biochemical changes in muscle, or peripheral and central control mechanisms of adaptation.
Also, the background knowledge on these musculoskeletal mechanisms of adaptation should be connected to the actual training practices.
In this context, theoretical knowledge should be effectively tested and critically viewed based on human sports performance. In addition, authors should try to present practical applications based on their findings and substantiated, with the latest literature, which Performande to clarify the adaptive responses of exercise.
Sort by: Views Type Date Views Views Type Date. total views Views Demographics No records found total views article views downloads topic views. Select a time period }. The displayed data aggregates results from Frontiers and PubMed Central®. Top countries. Top referring sites.
: Performance training adaptations| Musculoskeletal Adaptations to Training and Sports Performance: Connecting Theory and Practice | Young WB. Motor learning research tells us that Hypoglycemia and hypothyroidism positive reinforcement qdaptations the technique traoning occur, the biomechanics adaptaions in practice must closely resemble those Performance training adaptations in competition [ 89]. The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. When feedback is provided during resistance training, kinetic and kinematic outputs are enhanced, with barbell velocity significantly increasing by approximately 8. Article PubMed Google Scholar Weakley J, Mann B, Banyard H, Mclaren S, Scott T, Garcia-Ramos A. BMC Med Res Method. |
| References | Sports nutrition for performance enhancement sprint work: physiological responses, mechanisms of fatigue and the influence of Performance training adaptations fitness. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Tønnessen E, Performance training adaptations Trainong, Haugen Performance training adaptations, Enoksen E. The trainiing of augmented traininf type adaptatjons frequency on velocity-based training-induced adaptation and retention. Article Perfprmance PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Malone JK, Blake C, Caulfield BM. Furthermore, these changes in glycogen content have been related to changes in muscle signaling proteins e. In the American College of Sports Medicine position stand, the recommendations for rest period length and training frequency for power training are like those for novice, intermediate, and advanced athletes [ 90 ]. As athletes become more trained, they require greater training stimuli to continue to adapt and elevate their performance capacity closer to their genetic ceilings. |
| What is training adaptation? – Human Kinetics Canada | Also, the background knowledge on these musculoskeletal mechanisms of adaptation should be connected to the actual training practices. In this context, theoretical knowledge should be effectively tested and critically viewed based on human sports performance. In addition, authors should try to present practical applications based on their findings and substantiated, with the latest literature, which help to clarify the adaptive responses of exercise. Sort by: Views Type Date Views Views Type Date. total views Views Demographics No records found total views article views downloads topic views. Select a time period }. The displayed data aggregates results from Frontiers and PubMed Central®. Top countries. Top referring sites. Physiological adaptations are always specific to the training and stress placed upon the body. It is the adaptations that occur that cause the improvement in performance after training. Training that uses the principles of training will cause more adaptations than training that does not. For chronic sprint performance Fig. Forest plot demonstrating the chronic effects of augmented feedback on jump performance. Forest plot demonstrating the chronic effects of augmented feedback on sprint performance. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to 1 establish the evidence for the effects of feedback on acute resistance training performance and chronic training adaptations; 2 quantify the effects of feedback on acute kinematic outcomes and changes in physical adaptations; and 3 assess the effects of a range of moderating factors e. Of the 13 acute studies that met inclusion criteria, our results demonstrate that regular visual or verbal feedback can enhance training performance with greater force, velocity, power, volume, and repetitions completed. The effects of feedback on chronic adaptations tended to support the acute findings, with all studies reporting either greater strength, power, speed, or lifting competency when feedback is provided during training. The meta-analytical outcomes suggested that the provision of feedback can provide meaningful advantages and this can manifest in superior jump and short sprint performance across a training programme. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that the regular provision of feedback is an effective and efficient ergogenic aid that elicits improvements in resistance training performance and can lead to superior adaptations. Considering that feedback can easily be implemented into training and no study shows a detrimental effect, practitioners who wish to maximise athlete training performance and subsequent adaptations are strongly recommended to provide regular, ongoing visual or verbal kinetic or kinematic feedback. Additionally, researchers should be aware of this powerful ergogenic aid and ensure that the provision of feedback during resistance training research is carefully standardised. Figure 5 provides a brief overview of the effects and considerations of feedback during resistance training. Of the 13 studies that investigated the effects of feedback on acute resistance training performance, all studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of feedback provision. Of note, it appears that feedback is most effective at improving acute resistance training performance when it is provided following each repetition [ 17 ]. Furthermore, the addition of verbal encouragement on top of visual or verbal kinematic feedback does not appear to provide any additional benefit [ 52 , 53 ]. However, it should be noted that when athletes are provided feedback and then it is taken away, performance immediately returns to non-feedback levels [ 47 , 52 , 53 ]. This agrees with previous non-loaded, plyometric research by Keller et al. Thus, to maximise resistance kinetic and kinematic outputs, it is recommended that practitioners provide frequent i. Several mechanisms have been used to explain why improvements in resistance training performance occur when feedback is provided. Specifically, improvements in motivation and competitiveness have been reported to occur when visual feedback is given [ 16 , 45 ]. These changes in psychological state have been shown to enhance velocity and power output during both resistance training [ 16 , 45 ] and non-loaded plyometric [ 55 ] exercise. Further, feedback during resistance training has been reported to reduce perceived physical demand [ 16 ], and the reported changes in motivation and competitiveness appear to mitigate the acute effects of fatigue across an exercise set [ 15 ]. This can enable athletes to complete a greater number of repetitions, and subsequently greater volume, prior to reaching the point of concentric failure [ 15 ]. Consequently, it is plausible that the greater kinetic and kinematic outputs that are commonly observed with the provision of feedback [ 14 , 17 , 18 , 46 ] are made possible through improved psychological state [ 16 , 45 , 55 ] and reductions in perceptions of physical demand [ 16 , 55 ]. The meta-analysis of acute outcomes demonstrated that feedback causes an immediate improvement of approximately 8. Mean and peak velocity are commonly monitored during resistance training as they are closely related to physical capacity due to their reliable output [ 9 , 38 , 56 ] and linear relationship with load [ 57 , 58 , 59 ]. This shows that feedback is an effective method of enhancing physical performance during resistance training and can cause immediate improvements in kinetic and kinematic outputs. Greater intent and kinematic outputs during training have been linked to enhanced physical adaptation in strength and power outcomes [ 60 , 61 ] and these findings help to explain the superior chronic adaptations that have been observed throughout the literature [ 19 , 21 , 22 ]. The moderator analysis showed no statistical differences in whether high i. However, visual feedback of kinematic data was found to have a statistically greater influence on velocity outputs than verbal feedback refer to Table 3. Pairing this information with findings from Nagata et al. Furthermore, researchers must be aware that feedback can substantially enhance performance, and this should be carefully standardised when monitoring changes in physical capacity. Seven studies have investigated the effects of feedback on chronic training outcomes, with all interventions occurring across 4- to 6-week mesocycles. Four studies investigated the effects of verbal or visual feedback on changes in sprint, jump, or maximal strength [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], while three used a combination of verbal coaching cues and visual feedback to quantify changes in performance of the power clean or power snatch [ 23 , 48 , 49 ]. Similar to the studies that investigated acute outcomes, feedback was largely found to augment adaptations above and beyond what occurs when feedback is not consistently provided during training. Furthermore, no study demonstrated that feedback impaired training adaptations compared with a training control group. It should also be noted that while technology e. This suggests that a range of methods can be used within a training mesocycle to provide feedback to athletes and that even small concerted periods of exposure can provide substantial benefit. Feedback was found to enhance jump performance in all studies that assessed changes across a training programme [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. It is feasible that the larger observed improvements in strength [ 21 , 22 ] may have influenced these improvements in jump results, as the ability to exert force is fundamental to ballistic performance [ 62 ]. Additionally, it is likely that the chronic exposure to greater barbell velocities, and subsequently power outputs, during ballistic exercises [ 19 , 20 , 21 ] allowed athletes to expose themselves to a greater training stimulus. This reflects the acute findings of the meta-analysis and helps emphasise that improvements in acute training stimuli may lead to enhanced training adaptations. It should be acknowledged that a single study [ 19 ] that assessed changes in jump performance was removed from the meta-analysis due to the sensitivity analysis demonstrating the extreme nature of the findings. However, with these findings included ESM File S3 , it was demonstrated that feedback may promote even greater changes in jump performance. The effects of feedback during resistance training were clearly observed on changes in short sprint performance i. As demonstrated within the current systematic review findings, greater changes in strength and power were consistently reported with the provision of feedback, and it is well established that the ability to rapidly exert force is fundamental to acceleration [ 63 , 64 ]. Thus, it could be reasonable to speculate that the observed changes in strength and power underpinned these changes in short sprint performance. It should be acknowledged that when outcomes were limited to a single testing distance i. Consequently, for practitioners who wish to maximise acceleration and speed in their athletes, it is strongly recommended that feedback is consistently provided during resistance training as this will promote greater short distance sprint adaptations. While this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate the acute and chronic effects of feedback on resistance training performance and adaptations, several limitations and future directions should be acknowledged. First, due to the relatively small number of studies that have investigated the chronic effects of resistance training with feedback on training adaptations, only jump and short sprint performance outcomes could be assessed. Naturally, practitioners are often interested in additional physical qualities e. It should be noted that despite the inability to meta-analyse certain outcomes, findings from the systematic review can help guide practitioners in whether feedback would enhance adaptations in non-meta-analysed outcomes. For example, 3RM strength in the back squat was assessed by both Weakley et al. Therefore, these findings may still be useful for practitioners. Second, due to the aims of the current study, it was not feasible to investigate effects of feedback on non-loaded plyometric outcomes. However, it is likely that comparable benefits occur, with previous research indicating that there are similar improvements in acute and chronic outcomes [ 54 , 55 , 65 , 66 ]. Third, due to the relatively homogenous nature of the participants in the chronic studies, further research that investigates chronic adaptations in young, old, and female participants may be warranted to fully elucidate the effects of feedback. Finally, further studies may continue to investigate the effects of different forms of feedback on acute and chronic outcomes. Previous research [ 14 ] has indicated that athletes may have a preference as to the form of feedback, and this may be influenced by personality traits e. Findings from this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that the provision of feedback during resistance training can be a potent tool for acutely enhancing performance and chronically improving adaptations. Consequently, researchers and practitioners should be aware of its effects and how they can be used to ensure better performance, standardisation, and training outcomes. In the acute setting, feedback may be particularly useful to help drive intent and enhance kinetic and kinematic outputs. In athletes who are technically competent, this can be useful in helping to enhance the stimulus that is applied and may lead to the superior physical adaptations that have been reported throughout the literature. Alternatively, in athletes with limited resistance training experience, some forms of feedback e. Furthermore, the provision of feedback may be useful in helping to improve certain psychological traits that may be beneficial for performance. For example, motivation and competitiveness can be enhanced when feedback is provided. This may not only lead to greater kinetic and kinematic outputs but may also be useful in increasing the total volume that can be completed [ 15 ] and reducing the perceived physical demand of the resistance training exercise [ 16 ]. When monitoring and testing athletes, however, researchers and practitioners should also be aware of the effects of feedback. Due to the clear effects of feedback on acute performance, common assessments of performance which are used to monitor strength and power adaptations and guide training prescription, such as load-velocity profiles [ 8 , 57 , 67 ] and maximal effort against a set load [ 15 , 35 , 68 ], may be substantially altered. Consequently, when aiming to use kinetic or kinematic data from a resistance training session to infer changes in performance, it is strongly recommended that feedback is standardised, as the improvements in acute performance that are observed when feedback is provided are often larger than the typical between-day changes in performance that are commonly reported [ 29 , 67 , 69 , 70 ]. An example of this could be if feedback is provided during testing e. The current findings demonstrate that practitioners can confidently implement feedback into resistance training to enhance physical adaptations. The systematic review demonstrated that all physical qualities that were assessed had larger improvements with feedback than when no feedback was provided, and the meta-analysis demonstrated that jump and sprint performance can be enhanced with its use. Furthermore, it is important to recognise that feedback was not found to be detrimental under any conditions and that the improvements reported were above and beyond those that were reported with regular, supervised training prescription in highly trained athletes [ 19 , 20 , 22 ]. In practice, feedback can be provided through a range of different methods, with the greatest benefits seen when it is given with high frequency i. However, athlete preference and feasibility should take precedence when deciding how and when feedback is provided. Thus, practitioners may wish to selectively implement feedback during exercises that benefit from greater kinetic and kinematic outputs e. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates clear benefits to performance and adaptation when feedback is supplied during resistance training. In all studies within the review, feedback was found to augment performance and adaptation beyond that observed with no feedback and there were no detrimental effects reported. Furthermore, when feedback was provided, there were no statistical differences in performance outcomes when high i. However, there may be slight benefits of providing kinematic feedback visually compared with verbally. From the studies included within this review, it was apparent that the frequency of feedback was an important consideration, with greater frequencies being substantially more effective for performance and adaptation compared with lower frequencies e. It was clear that feedback can improve resistance training kinetic and kinematic outputs during training beyond normal maximal intent and these greater outputs may help drive greater performance adaptations. While a range of physical qualities were assessed within the literature e. It should be noted that these changes are above and beyond regular training responses and demonstrate the potency of feedback to augment training adaptations. Moore DA, Jones B, Weakley J, Whitehead S, Till K. The field and resistance training loads of academy rugby league players during a pre-season: comparisons across playing positions. PLoS One. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Mcleod JC, Stokes T, Phillips SM. Resistance exercise training as a primary countermeasure to age-related chronic disease. Front Physiol. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Till K, Darrall-Jones J, Weakley JJ, Roe GA, Jones BL. The influence of training age on the annual development of physical qualities within academy rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. Article PubMed Google Scholar. Weakley J, Till K, Darrall-Jones J, Roe GA, Phibbs PJ, Read DB, et al. Strength and conditioning practices in adolescent rugby players: relationship with changes in physical qualities. Morton RW, Oikawa SY, Wavell CG, Mazara N, Mcglory C, Quadrilatero J, et al. Neither load nor systemic hormones determine resistance training-mediated hypertrophy or strength gains in resistance-trained young men. J Appl Physiol. Banyard HG, Tufano JJ, Weakley JJS, Wu S, Jukic I, Nosaka K. Superior changes in jump, sprint, and change-of-direction performance but not maximal strength following 6 weeks of velocity-based training compared with 1-repetition-maximum percentage-based training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. Bird SP, Tarpenning KM, Marino FE. Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness. Sports Med. García-Ramos A, Ulloa-Díaz D, Barboza-González P, Rodríguez-Perea Á, Martínez-García D, Quidel-Catrilelbún M, et al. Assessment of the load-velocity profile in the free-weight prone bench pull exercise through different velocity variables and regression models. Pearson M, García-Ramos A, Morrison M, Ramirez-Lopez C, Dalton-Barron N, Weakley J. Velocity loss thresholds reliably control kinetic and kinematic outputs during free weight resistance training. Int J Environ Res. Google Scholar. Schoenfeld BJ, Peterson MD, Ogborn D, Contreras B, Sonmez GT. Effects of low-vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning: a review and critical reappraisal. Psychol Bull. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Wälchli M, Ruffieux J, Bourquin Y, Keller M, Taube W. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Argus CK, Gill ND, Keogh JW, Hopkins WG. Acute effects of verbal feedback on upper-body performance in elite athletes. Weakley J, Wilson K, Till K, Banyard H, Dyson J, Phibbs P, et al. Show me, tell me, encourage me: the effect of different forms of feedback on resistance training performance. Ok DP, Bae JY. J Men Health. Article Google Scholar. Weakley J, Wilson K, Till K, Darrall-Jones J, Roe G, Phibbs P, et al. Visual feedback maintains mean concentric barbell velocity, and improves motivation, competitiveness, and perceived workload in male adolescent athletes. Pérez-Castilla A, Jiménez-Alonso A, Cepero M, Miras-Moreno S, Rojas FJ, García-Ramos A. Velocity performance feedback during ballistic training: which is the optimal frequency of feedback administration? Mot Control. Jiménez-Alonso A, García-Ramos A, Cepero M, Miras-Moreno S, Rojas FJ, Pérez-Castilla A. Effect of augmented feedback on velocity performance during strength-oriented and power-oriented resistance training sessions. Nagata A, Doma K, Yamashita D, Hasegawa H, Mori S. The effect of augmented feedback type and frequency on velocity-based training-induced adaptation and retention. Randell AD, Cronin JB, Keogh JW, Gill ND, Pedersen MC. Effect of instantaneous performance feedback during 6 weeks of velocity-based resistance training on sport-specific performance tests. Vanderka M, Bezák A, Longová K, Krcmár M, Walker S. Use of visual feedback during jump-squat training aids improvement in sport-specific tests in athletes. Weakley J, Till K, Sampson J, Banyard H, Leduc C, Wilson K, et al. The effects of augmented feedback on sprint, jump, and strength adaptations in rugby union players following a four week training programme. Winchester JB, Porter JM, Mcbride JM. Changes in bar path kinematics and kinetics through use of summary feedback in power snatch training. Page M, Mckenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, et al. The prisma statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Steele J, Plotkin D, Van Every D, Rosa A, Zambrano H, Mendelovits B, et al. Slow and steady, or hard and fast? A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing body composition changes between interval training and moderate intensity continuous training. Sports Basel. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. Crang ZL, Duthie G, Cole MH, Weakley J, Hewitt A, Johnston RD. The validity and reliability of wearable microtechnology for intermittent team sports: a systematic review. Weakley J, Morrison M, García-Ramos A, Johnston R, James L, Cole M. The validity and reliability of commercially available resistance training monitoring devices—a systematic review. Weakley J, Halson SL, Mujika I. Overtraining syndrome symptoms and diagnosis in athletes: where is the research? A systematic review. Team R. Rstudio: integrated development for r, in Boston, MA Lüdecke D, Lüdecke MD, Calculator'from David BW. R Package Version 0. Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in r with the metafor package. J Stat Softw. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Book Google Scholar. Weakley JJS, Till K, Read DB, Leduc C, Roe GB, Phibbs PJ, et al. Jump training in rugby union players: barbell or hexagonal bar? Weakley J, Munteanu G, Cowley N, Johnston R, Morrison M, Gardiner C, et al. The criterion validity and between-day reliability of the perch for measuring barbell velocity during commonly used resistance training exercises. Weakley J, Chalkley D, Johnston R, García-Ramos A, Townshend A, Dorrell H, et al. |
Performance training adaptations -
Finally, if the load is too low, a detraining or involution effect will occur, causing a maladaptive response that results in a significant reduction in performance capacity.
According to Viru , this is termed a useless load because it does not stimulate adaptation, maintain performance capacity, or induce recovery after a training load that provides an overload stimulus In fact, compelling evidence in the scientific literature suggests that undertraining i.
In order to create a protective effect against injury while improving performance, athletes must strive to not only train harder but also train smarter with more systematically structured and monitored training interventions For example, a load that stimulates adaptation for a novice athlete may only serve to maintain performance capacity for an intermediate athlete and will cause detraining effects for a more advanced athlete figure 1.
Conversely, a training load that stimulates adaptations for a more advanced athlete will be excessive when applied to novice athletes and result in a significant increase in injury risk and occurrences of overtraining responses.
Ultimately, the primary objective of the training process is to systematically and progressively implement overload as part of the training process. This process is often referred to as progressive overload , in which the athlete is exposed to higher training loads to overcome the threshold of adaptation figure 1.
To be effective, these loads need to be implemented into the training plan in a progressive manner because significant increases or spikes in training have been associated with increased injury risk 57, 58, , For example, Gabbett et al.
There are, however, scenarios in which a sharp spike in training, or what is termed overreaching , is warranted; if programmed correctly, these increased periods of training can be powerful tools for inducing adaptation and performance gains in subsequent training periods Based on these data, it is recommended that variations in training loads be carefully planned to minimize the risk of injuries associated with significant spikes in training loads.
As athletes become more trained, they require greater training stimuli to continue to adapt and elevate their performance capacity closer to their genetic ceilings. Therefore, the athlete needs to be exposed to progressively increasing training loads in order to continue to stimulate adaptation and elevate performance 39, , This is most evident in the progression of the athlete through their long-term athlete development plan 50, , , in which training focus and loads are varied to continue to stimulate adaptive responses and performance gains.
For example, athletes who have the alpha-actinin-3 ACTN3 R allele exhibit an enhanced response to resistance training, whereas those with the ACTN3 XX genotype display a reduced responsiveness to resistance training Previous Next.
Call Us Hours Mon-Fri 9am - 5pm EST. Seiler KS, Kjerland GØ. Seiler KS. What is best practice for training intensity and duration distribution in endurance athletes? Morin JB, Samozino P. Interpreting power-force-velocity profiles for individualised and specific training.
Bosco C, Tihanyi J, Viru A. Relationships between field fitness test and basal serum testosterone and cortisol levels in soccer players. Clin Physiol. Epstein RH. Aroused: a history of hormones and how they control just about everything.
Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA, Nindl BC. Recovery responses of testosterone, growth hormone, and IGF-1 after resistance exercise. Samozino P, Rabita G, Dorel S, Slawinski J, Peyrot N, Saez de Villarreal E, et al. A simple method for measuring power, force, velocity properties, and mechanical effectiveness in sprint running.
Cross MR, Brughelli M, Samozino P, Morin JB. Methods of power-force-velocity profiling during sprint running: a narrative review. Rakovic E, Paulsen G, Helland C, Eriksrud O, Haugen T. The effect of individualised sprint training in elite female team sport athletes: a pilot study.
Lai A, Schache AG, Brown NA, Pandy MG. Human ankle plantar flexor muscle-tendon mechanics and energetics during maximum acceleration sprinting.
J R Soc Interface. Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar. Miller RH, Umberger BR, Caldwell GE. Sensitivity of maximum sprinting speed to characteristic parameters of the muscle force-velocity relationship.
Weyand PG, Sandell RF, Prime DN, Bundle MW. The biological limits to running speed are imposed from the ground up. Helland C, Haugen T, Rakovic E, Eriksrud O, Seynnes O, Mero AA, et al. Force-velocity profiling of sprinting athletes: single-run vs.
multiple-run methods. Seiler S, Jøranson K, Olesen BV, Hetlelid KJ. Adaptations to aerobic interval training: interactive effects of exercise intensity and total work duration. Tønnessen E, Shalfawi S, Haugen T, Enoksen E. The effect of m repeated sprint training on maximum sprinting speed, repeated sprint endurance, vertical jump and aerobic capacity in young elite male soccer players.
Haugen T, Tønnessen E, Leirstein S, Hem E, Seiler S. Haugen T, Tønnessen E, Øksenholt Ø, Haugen FL, Paulsen G, Enoksen E, Seiler S. Sprint conditioning of soccer players: effects of training intensity and technique supervision. Jakeman JR, McMullan J, Babraj JA.
Efficacy of a four-week uphill sprint training intervention in field hockey players. Kavaliauskas M, Kilvington R, Babraj J.
Effects of in-season uphill sprinting on physical characteristics in semi-professional soccer players. Cross MR, Lahti J, Brown SR, Chedati M, Jimenez-Reyes P, Samozino P, et al. Training at maximal power in resisted sprinting: optimal load determination methodology and pilot results in team sport athletes.
Lockie RG, Murphy AJ, Spinks CD. Effects of resisted sled towing on sprint kinematics in field-sport athletes. Cross MR, Brughelli M, Samozino P, Brown SR, Morin JB. Optimal loading for maximizing power during sled-resisted sprinting.
Morin JB, Petrakos G, Jiménez-Reyes P, Brown SR, Samozino P, Cross MR. Very-heavy sled training for improving horizontal-force output in soccer players. Kristensen GO, van den Tillaar R, Ettema GJ. Velocity specificity in early-phase sprint training. Cissik JM. Means and methods of speed training, part II.
Strength Cond J. Mero A, Komi PV. Force-, EMG-, and elasticity-velocity relationships at submaximal, maximal and supramaximal running speeds in sprinters. Clark DA, Sabick MB, Pfeiffer RP, Kuhlman SM, Knigge NA, Shea KG.
Influence of towing force magnitude on the kinematics of supramaximal sprinting. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance: a situation based learning approach. Stodden DF, Gao Z, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ. Dynamic relationships between motor skill competence and health-related fitness in youth.
Pediatr Exerc Sci. Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA, Rudisill ME, Garcia C, et al. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: an emergent relationship. Porter JM, Wu WF, Crossley RM, Knopp SW, Campbell OC.
Adopting an external focus of attention improves sprinting performance in low-skilled sprinters. Wulf G. Attentional focus and motor learning: a review of 15 year. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. Winkelman NC, Clark KP, Ryan LJ. Experience level influences the effect of attentional focus on sprint performance.
Hum Mov Sci. Porter JM, Wu WFW, Partridge JA. Focus of attention and verbal instructions: strategies of elite track and field coaches and athletes. Sport Sci Rev. Benz A, Winkelman N, Porter J, Nimphius S. Coaching instructions and cues for enhancing sprint performance.
Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2 - training considerations for improving maximal power production.
Helland C, Hole E, Iversen E, Olsson MC, Seynnes O, Solberg PA, Paulsen G. Training strategies to improve muscle power: is Olympic-style weightlifting relevant? Seitz LB, Reyes A, Tran TT, Saez de Villarreal E, Haff GG. Increases in lower-body strength transfer positively to sprint performance: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Harries SK, Lubans DR, Callister R. Resistance training to improve power and sports performance in adolescent athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Moir G, Sanders R, Button C, Glaister M. The effect of periodized resistance training on accelerative sprint performance. Sports Biomech. Comyns TM, Harrison AJ, Hennessy LK. Effect of squatting on sprinting performance and repeated exposure to complex training in male rugby players.
Uth N. Anthropometric comparison of world-class sprinters and normal populations. J Sports Sci Med. PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar. Loturco I, Contreras B, Kobal R, Fernandes V, Moura N, Siqueira F, et al. Vertically and horizontally directed muscle power exercises: relationships with top-level sprint performance.
Delecluse C, Coppenolle HV, Willems E, Van Leemputte M, Diels R, Goris M. Influence of high-resistance and high velocity training on sprint performance. Young WB. Transfer of strength and power training to sports performance. Wathen D. NSCA J. Sáez de Villarreal E, Requena B, Cronin JB.
The effects of plyometric training on sprint performance: a meta-analysis. Nédélec M, Halson S, Delecroix B, Abaidia AE, Ahmaidi S, Dupont G. Sleep hygiene and recovery strategies in elite soccer players. Gupta L, Morgan K, Gilchrist S. Does elite sport degrade sleep quality?
A systematic review. Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. American College of Sports Medicine joint position statement. Nutrition and athletic performance. Nédélec M, McCall A, Carling C, Legall F, Berthoin S, Dupont G.
Recovery in soccer: part ii-recovery strategies. Barnett A. Using recovery modalities between training sessions in elite athletes: does it help?
Ortiz RO Jr, Sinclair Elder AJ, Elder CL, Dawes JJ. A systematic review on the effectiveness of active recovery interventions on athletic performance of professional-, collegiate-, and competitive-level adult athletes. Van Hooren B, Peake JM. Do we need a cool-down after exercise?
A narrative review of the psychophysiological effects and the effects on performance, injuries and the long-term adaptive response. Opplert J, Babault N.
Acute effects of dynamic stretching on muscle flexibility and performance: an analysis of the current literature. Winchester JB, Nelson AG, Landin D, Young MA, Schexnayder IC.
Static stretching impairs sprint performance in collegiate track and field athletes. Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Kvorning T, Kay AD, Goh AG, Hilton B, et al. No effect of muscle stretching within a full, dynamic warm-up on athletic performance. Dupuy O, Douzi W, Theurot D, Bosquet L, Dugué B. An evidence-based approach for choosing post-exercise recovery techniques to reduce markers of muscle damage, soreness, fatigue, and inflammation: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Poppendieck W, Wegmann M, Ferrauti A, Kellmann M, Pfeiffer M, Meyer T. Massage and performance recovery: a meta-analytical review. Mine K, Lei D, Nakayama T. Is pre-performance massage effective to improve maximal muscle strength and functional performance? Int J Sports Phys Ther.
Engel FA, Holmberg HC, Sperlich B. Is there evidence that runners can benefit from wearing compression clothing? Marqués-Jiménez D, Calleja-González J, Arratibel I, Delextrat A, Terrados N. Are compression garments effective for the recovery of exercise-induced muscle damage?
A systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiol Behav. Leeder JD, van Someren KA, Bell PG, Spence JR, Jewell AP, Gaze D, Howatson G. Effects of seated and standing cold water immersion on recovery from repeated sprinting.
Leeder J, Gissane C, van Someren K, Gregson W, Howatson G. Cold water immersion and recovery from strenuous exercise: a meta-analysis. Bieuzen F, Bleakley CM, Costello JT. Contrast water therapy and exercise induced muscle damage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Roberts LA, Raastad T, Markworth JF, Figueiredo VC, Egner IM, Shield A, et al. Post-exercise cold water immersion attenuates acute anabolic signalling and long-term adaptations in muscle to strength training.
J Physiol. Malone JK, Blake C, Caulfield BM. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation during recovery from exercise: a systematic review.
Weerapong P, Hume PA, Kolt GS. The mechanisms of massage and effects on performance, muscle recovery and injury prevention. Mujika I, Padilla S. Scientific bases for precompetition tapering strategies. Pyne DB, Mujika I, Reilly T. Peaking for optimal performance: research limitations and future directions.
Mujika I. The influence of training characteristics and tapering on the adaptation in highly trained individuals: a review. Intense training: the key to optimal performance before and during the taper.
Zaras ND, Stasinaki AN, Krase AA, Methenitis SK, Karampatsos GP, Georgiadis GV, et al. Effects of tapering with light vs. heavy loads on track and field throwing performance. Bosquet L, Montpetit J, Arvisais D, Mujika I.
Effects of tapering on performance: a meta-analysis. Pritchard HJ, Tod DA, Barnes MJ, Keogh JW, McGuigan MR. Pritchard HJ, Barnes MJ, Stewart RJ, Keogh JW, McGuigan MR.
Higher- versus lower-intensity strength-training taper: effects on neuromuscular performance. Grgic J, Mikulic P. Tapering practices of Croatian open-class powerlifting champions. Ritchie D, Allen JB, Kirkland A.
Where science meets practice: Olympic coaches' crafting of the tapering process. Download references. The authors want to thank elite sprint coach Håkan Andersson for his valuable inputs during the process. Faculty of Health Sciences, Kristiania University College, PB Sentrum, , Oslo, Norway.
Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, PB , , Kristiansand, Norway. Centre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, , Trondheim, Norway.
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. TH, SS, ØS, and ET planned the review. TH retrieved the relevant literature. All authors were engaged in drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Correspondence to Thomas Haugen. The authors, Thomas Haugen, Stephen Seiler, Øyvind Sandbakk, and Espen Tønnessen, declare that they have no competing interests. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.
Reprints and permissions. Haugen, T. et al. The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance: an Integration of Scientific and Best Practice Literature. Sports Med - Open 5 , 44 Download citation.
Received : 22 July Accepted : 23 October Published : 21 November Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content.
Search all SpringerOpen articles Search. Download PDF. Review Article Open access Published: 21 November The Training and Development of Elite Sprint Performance: an Integration of Scientific and Best Practice Literature Thomas Haugen ORCID: orcid. Abstract Despite a voluminous body of research devoted to sprint training, our understanding of the training process leading to a world-class sprint performance is limited.
Key Points There are considerable gaps between science and best practice in how training principles and training methods should be applied for elite sprint performance This review serves as a position statement for outlining state-of-the-art sprint training recommendations We provide a point of departure for discussion between scientists and practitioners regarding the training and development of sprint performance.
Sprint Performance Determinants The m sprint has traditionally been categorized into three main phases: acceleration, maximal velocity, and deceleration [ 19 , 20 ].
Table 1 Split times mean ± SD across m sprint performance level Full size table. Sprint Performance Development Sprint performance capacity evolves and devolves throughout life via growth, maturation, training, and aging [ 5 , 67 , 68 , 69 ]. Training Principles Progressive Overload Long-term performance development is only achieved when athletes are exposed to a systematic increase in training load over time, while adequate recovery is ensured [ 85 ].
Specificity Training adaptations are specific to the stimulus applied, encompassing movement patterns and force-velocity characteristics such as muscle actions and muscle groups used, speed of movement, range of motion, training load, and energy systems involved [ 89 ]. Variation and Periodization The principle of variation builds on the notion that systematic variation in specific training variables is most effective for long-term adaptations [ 90 , 91 , 92 ].
Training Methods Sprint Training The vast majority of scientific studies investigating sprint training methods are performed on young team sport athletes where brief sprints with short recoveries are the norm [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ].
Table 2 Summary of best practice sprint training recommendations Full size table. Table 3 Training week examples across varying meso-cycles Full size table.
Table 4 Intensity scale for sprint training expressed as , , and m flying splits s Full size table. Recovery Strategies The performance capacity of an athlete depends on an optimal balance between training and recovery.
Tapering Tapering refers to the marked reduction of total training load in the final days before an important competition. Conclusions This review has contrasted scientific and best practice literature. Table 6 Summary of the level of agreement between scientific and best practice literature Full size table.
Availability of Data and Materials Not applicable. References Bishop D, Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A. Article PubMed Google Scholar Petrakos G, Morin JB, Egan B. Article PubMed Google Scholar Rumpf MC, Lockie RG, Cronin JB, Jalilvand F. Article PubMed Google Scholar Haugen T, Tønnessen E, Hisdal J, Seiler S.
Article PubMed Google Scholar Haugen T, Solberg PA, Morán-Navarro R, Breitschädel F, Hopkins W, Foster C. Article PubMed Google Scholar Haugen T, Buchheit M. Article PubMed Google Scholar Tønnessen E, Sylta Ø, Haugen T, Hem E, Svendsen I, Seiler S.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar Tønnessen E, Svendsen I, Rønnestad B, Hisdal J, Haugen T, Seiler S. Article PubMed Google Scholar Solli GS, Tønnessen E, Sandbakk Ø. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lee J.
Google Scholar Volkov NI, Lapin VI. CAS PubMed Google Scholar Mero A, Komi PV, Gregor RJ. Article CAS Google Scholar Nagahara R, Matsubayashi T, Matsuo A, Zushi K.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Tønnessen E, Haugen T, Shalfawi SA. Article PubMed Google Scholar Slawinski J, Termoz N, Rabita G, Guilhem G, Dorel S, Morin JB, et al. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Haugen T, McGhie D, Ettema G. Article PubMed Google Scholar Scientific report on the second IAAF World Championships in athletics, Rome Google Scholar Kersting U.
Google Scholar Biomechanics research project in the IAAF World Championships Daegu Google Scholar Bissas A, Walker J, Tucker C, Paradisis G, Merlino S. Google Scholar Morin JB, Edouard P, Samozino P.
Article PubMed Google Scholar Morin JB, Bourdin M, Edouard P, Peyrot N, Samozino P, Lacour JR. Article PubMed Google Scholar Haugen T, Breitschädel F, Seiler S. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Seiler S, De Koning JJ, Foster C.
Article PubMed Google Scholar Haugen T, Paulsen G, Seiler S, Sandbakk O. Article PubMed Google Scholar Rabita G, Dorel S, Slawinski J, Sàez-de-Villarreal E, Couturier A, Samozino P, et al.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Ettema G, McGhie D, Danielsen J, Sandbakk Ø, Haugen T. Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar Haugen T, Danielsen J, Alnes LO, McGhie D, Sandbakk O, Ettema G.
Article PubMed Google Scholar Nagahara R, Naito H, Morin JB, Zushi K. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Nagahara R, Zushi K. PubMed Google Scholar Kunz H, Kaufmann DA. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Mann R, Herman J.
Article Google Scholar Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair PJ. Article PubMed Google Scholar Hunter JP, Marshall RN, McNair PJ. Article PubMed Google Scholar Kugler F, Janshen L. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Colyer SL, Nagahara R, Salo AIT.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Colyer SL, Nagahara R, Takai Y, Salo AIT. Article PubMed Google Scholar Nagahara R, Mizutani M, Matsuo A, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Article PubMed Google Scholar Bezodis NE, Willwacher, Salo AIT. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Fitts RH.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Glaister M. Article PubMed Google Scholar Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A, Bishop D. Article PubMed Google Scholar Brocherie F, Millet GP, Morin JB, Girard O. Article PubMed Google Scholar Chelly SM, Denis C.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Girard O, Micallef JP, Millet GP. Article PubMed Google Scholar Girard O, Brocherie F, Morin JB, Millet GP. Article PubMed Google Scholar Girard O, Brocherie F, Tomazin K, Farooq A, Morin JB. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Morin JB, Jeannin T, Chevallier B, Belli A.
Article PubMed Google Scholar Duffield R, Dawson B, Goodman C. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Tucker R, Santos-Concejero J, Collins M. Article PubMed Google Scholar Lucia A, Oliván J, Gómez-Gallego F, Santiago C, Montil M, Foster C. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Smith DJ.
Article PubMed Google Scholar Del Coso J, Hiam D, Houweling P, Pérez LM, Eynon N, Lucía A. Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar Malina RM, Bouchard C, Beunen G. Article Google Scholar Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O.
Google Scholar Tønnessen E, Svendsen I, Olsen IC, Guttormsen A, Haugen T. Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar Hollings SC, Hopkins WG, Hume PA. Article Google Scholar Allen SV, Hopkins WG.
Article PubMed Google Scholar Haugen T, Tønnessen E, Seiler S. Article PubMed Google Scholar Boccia G, Moisè P, Franceschi A, Trova F, Panero D, La Torre A, et al. Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar Harman SM, Metter EJ, Tobin JD, Pearson J, Blackman MR.
Article CAS Google Scholar Korhonen MT, Cristea A, Alen M, Hakkinen K, Sipila S, Mero A, et al. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Hunter SK, Pereira HM, Keenan KG. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Hollings SC, Hume PA, Hopkins WG.
Article Google Scholar Hollings SC, Mallett CJ, Hume PA. Article Google Scholar Boccia G, Brustio PR, Moisè P, Franceschi A, La Torre A, Schena F, et al. Article PubMed Google Scholar Lloyd RS, Oliver JL, Faigenbaum AD, Howard R, De Ste Croix MB, Williams CA, et al. Article PubMed Google Scholar Helsen WF, Starkes JL, Hodges NJ.
Article Google Scholar Ericson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. Google Scholar Usain Bolt biography. CAS PubMed Google Scholar Gabbett TJ. Moxy Monitor. VO2 Max Elite endurance athletes have very high VO2 max readings; however, evidence suggests that a person's VO2 max is largely genetically predetermined, reports Sports Fitness Advisor.
Lactate Threshold While VO2 max determines one's limit in aerobic performance, the lactate threshold is responsible for the time an athlete may remain training at this limit.
Exercise Economy Alone, VO2 max and lactate threshold are not enough to determine an athlete's performance. Substrate Utilization A body's energy system can use either fat or carbohydrate stores in order to produce energy. Central Cardiovascular Physiological Adaptations Decreased heart rate Increased heart stroke volume Increased blood plasma Reduced blood viscosity Increased cardiac output Increased mitochondrial volume in muscle fibers being used Increase in number and size of myoglobin and oxidative enzymes Peripheral Physiological Adaptations Capillarization; there is an increase in the surface area supplied by the venous and arterial capillaries.
This allows for increased heat dissipation during intense exercise. Improved glycogen and fat storing capabilities in muscles; this allows for an increase heat dissipation during intense exercise, lengthening the time an athlete can work out. Development of slow twitch type 1 fibers; these increase efficiency and resistance to fatigue.
Oxygen transportation and distribution efficiency increases. Oxidative enzymes; succinate dehydrogenase SDH and others enable mitochondria to break down nutrients to create ATP.
These are present up to 2.
Carbohydrate timing for optimal performance the Performance training adaptations Performanec in Performance training adaptations training is adptations for athletes looking to continue improving their endurance adaaptations. In endurance Performamce, most limitations are caused by fatigue. An understanding of what causes this fatigue on a physiological level can help athletes manipulate conditions in order to induce physiological adaptations that will improve endurance performance. Endurance capabilities are measured through several markers. Following are some of the most important relative to physiological adaptation. Adaptxtions adaptations are always specific Carbohydrates with fast digestion the training and Performance training adaptations placed upon the Performance training adaptations. It traininv the adaptations that adaptationw that cause the improvement in performance Perfrmance training. Training that Performajce the Performance training adaptations of adaptayions Performance training adaptations cause more Psrformance than training that does not. Adaptations require training above the thresholds and create the need for an increased work load according to the principle of progressive overload. Physiological adaptations are lost when training stops and are more complete when training involves various activities. Adaptations in response to training include: decreased resting heart rate, increased stroke volume and cardiac output, increased oxygen uptake, increased haemoglobin levels in the blood, muscular hypertrophy, and various other changes within the muscles themselves increased myoglobin, increased mitochondria, increased aerobic or anaerobic enzymes according to training specificity, increased lactate thresholds, and much more. Describe the effect of stroke volume and cardiac output on aerobic performance.
Es ist schade, dass ich mich jetzt nicht aussprechen kann - es gibt keine freie Zeit. Ich werde befreit werden - unbedingt werde ich die Meinung aussprechen.