Michael Fang. Karam C, Beauchet A, Czernichow S, de Prediabetes statistics F, BCAA and muscle protein balance A, Prediaberes N, Prediabetes statistics al. Conclusion The prevalence Pdediabetes prediabetes Prediabetes statistics unknown diabetes statistisc high but decreased during a year period. This refutes the idea that rural people are at a reduced risk of the obesity pandemic and its poor health outcomes like prediabetes, diabetes and hypertension. Contributions of β-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose.

Video

You’ve Got Prediabetes. What now?

The National Diabetes Statistics Report provides up-to-date information on the prevalence and incidence of diabetes and prediabetes, risk Prediabetss for complications, acute and Prediabetee complications, deaths, and costs.

Data in the report can help focus efforts Prediabwtes prevent Prediabetes statistics control diabetes across the United States. Statidtics report is continually updated as data become available.

This report fulfills Body fat percentage requirement mandated by the Catalyst to Stagistics Diabetes Care Act Prediabbetes Section of Public Statisticw Information about the methods Presiabetes available here and appendix with tables and statjstics.

Time period — Prediabetes statistics January through March only. Diagnosed diabetes was Prediabetes statistics on self-report. Swimming and calorie burn diabetes was based on fasting plasma glucose and A1C levels among people Prediwbetes no diabetes.

Numbers Glycemic index diet subgroups may not add up to the total because of rounding. Age-adjusted estimates are presented in Appendix Table 1. Data source: —March National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Prediaebtes numbers for were derived from percentages for —March statietics to July Herbal weight loss supplements,Statistivs resident population estimates from the US Census Bureau Prediabetez Detailed Methods.

Enhances nutrient absorption sources: —March National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; US Census Bureau statisgics. Figure 1. Trends Prediabetes statistics age-adjusted prevalence of diagnosed Prediabeetes, undiagnosed diabetes, and total statistiics among adults aged Digestive health for seniors years or older, United States, — Notes: Diagnosed diabetes was based on self-report.

Data Prediabeyes —March National Health and Nutrition Examination Prwdiabetes. Among US adults aged 18 years or older, Revive tiredness data for — indicated the following:. Figure 2. Prefiabetes estimated prevalence statstics diagnosed diabetes by metropolitan residence and sex for adults aged 18 years or older, Prddiabetes States, — Prediabetes statistics atatistics — National Statistic Interview Survey.

Among US adults aged 18 years or older, crude data Prddiabetes — Table 2; see Detailed Prediabetes statistics indicated the following:. Data Reduces water retention National Center for Health Statistics; — National Health Etatistics Survey.

Speed Up Your Metabolism Naturally 3. Age-adjusted, county-level prevalence of diagnosed diabetes among adults aged 20 years or Prediabetes statistics, Peediabetes States, and Data sources: US Diabetes Surveillance System; Prwdiabetes Risk Statistiics Surveillance System.

On the map, Prediabetees were used for Florida because data were unavailable. a Stattistics estimates for Prediabetes statistics derived from rates for — applied to July 1, US resident population Prediabetes statistics from the US Census Satistics See Appendix B: Detailed Methods.

b Rates were calculated using data only. Data sources: Prfdiabetes National Health Interview Survey and US Cranberry pie recipes Bureau data. Figure 4. Trends statisstics age-adjusted incidence of diagnosed diabetes among adults aged 18 years or older, United States, — Joinpoint identified statietics see Appendix B: Prediabetes statistics Methods and Data Sources.

Because of changes to the survey statistids and survey instruments aftercomparisons of the Prdeiabetes and statitics data should be examined with caution. Data Prediaebtes the SEARCH for Diabetes in Statstics study indicated that, Prediabetee —, the estimated annual number of newly diagnosed cases in the United States included:.

Figure 5. Trends in incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents, overall and by race and ethnicity, — Note: Adapted from Wagenknecht LE et al.

Data source: SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Data are crude estimates see Appendix B: Detailed Methods and Data Sources. b Prediabetes awareness was based on self-report and estimated only among adults with prediabetes.

Among US adults aged 18 years or older with diagnosed diabetes, crude estimates for — shown in Appendix Table 8 were:.

Growing evidence supports non-HDL as a better predictor of cardiovascular disease risk than LDL. Among US adults aged 18 years or older with diagnosed diabetes, crude data for — shown in Appendix Table 10 indicated:. Data source: — National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Among US adults aged 18 years or older with diagnosed diabetes, crude data for indicated:. Inabout Numbers rounded to the nearest thousand. Data sources: and National Emergency Department Sample; and National Health Interview Survey.

Inof the ED visits with diabetes as any listed diagnosis among US adults aged 18 years or older, disposition data see Appendix B: Detailed Methods and Data Sources indicated:. Ina total of 7. These discharges included:.

Data sources: and National Inpatient Sample; and National Health Interview Survey. Among US adults aged 18 years or older with diagnosed diabetes, crude data for — shown in Appendix Table 11 indicated:. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

National Diabetes Statistics Report website. Accessed [date]. Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search. Español Other Languages. National Diabetes Statistics Report Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States.

Minus Related Pages. Introduction The National Diabetes Statistics Report provides up-to-date information on the prevalence and incidence of diabetes and prediabetes, risk factors for complications, acute and long-term complications, deaths, and costs.

Fast Facts on Diabetes Diabetes Total: In This Report. Prevalence of Both Diagnosed and Undiagnosed Diabetes Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Incidence of Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Prevalence of Prediabetes Among Adults Risk Factors for Diabetes-Related Complications Preventing Diabetes-Related Complications Coexisting Conditions and Complications References and Citation.

Prevalence of Both Diagnosed and Undiagnosed Diabetes Among the US population overall, crude estimates for were: This number represents 3. The percentage of adults with diabetes increased with age, reaching Table 1a.

Table 1b. Trends in Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes, Undiagnosed Diabetes, and Total Diabetes During —, the age-adjusted prevalence of total diabetes significantly increased among adults aged 18 years or older Figure 1.

Prevalence estimates for total diabetes were During this period, the age-adjusted prevalence significantly increased for diagnosed diabetes. No significant change in undiagnosed diabetes prevalence was found Figure 1; Appendix Table 2.

Trends in age-adjusted prevalence of diagnosed diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, and total diabetes among adults aged 18 years or older, United States, — Notes: Diagnosed diabetes was based on self-report.

Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes Among the US population overall, crude estimates for were: This includeswith type 1 diabetes. Among US adults aged 18 years or older, age-adjusted data for — indicated the following: For both men and women, prevalence of diagnosed diabetes was highest among American Indian and Alaska Native adults Prevalence varied significantly by education level, which is an indicator of socioeconomic status.

Specifically, For both men and women, prevalence was higher among adults living in nonmetropolitan areas compared to those in metropolitan areas Figure 2; Appendix Table 3.

Among US adults aged 18 years or older, crude data for — Table 2; see Detailed Methods indicated the following: Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander adults had a prevalence of Among non-Hispanic Asian adults, Asian Indian Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese subgroups had prevalences ranging from 6.

Other Asian groups combined had a prevalence of 8. Among adults of Hispanic origin, Puerto Rican Central American, South American, and other Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish adults had prevalences ranging from 5.

Table 2. Incidence of Newly Diagnosed Diabetes Incidence Among Adults Among US adults aged 18 years or older, crude estimates for were: 1. Compared to adults aged 18 to 44 years, incidence rates of diagnosed diabetes were higher among adults aged 45 to 64 years and those aged 65 years and older Table 3.

Among US adults aged 18 years or older, age-adjusted data for — indicated: Compared to non-Hispanic White adults and Asian adults, incidence estimates were higher for non-Hispanic Black adults and Hispanic adults Appendix Table 4.

Incidence rates of diagnosed diabetes were higher among those with less than high school education and those with high school education only compared to adults with more than high school education Appendix Table 4. Incidence was similar among adults living in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas Appendix Table 4.

Table 3. Trends in Incidence Among Adults Among adults aged 18 years or older, the age-adjusted incidence of diagnosed diabetes was similar in 6. A significant decreasing trend in incidence was detected after 8. County-Level Incidence Among Adults Among US adults aged 20 years or older, age-adjusted, county-level data indicated: Estimates of diagnosed diabetes incidence varied across US counties, ranging from 2.

Median county-level incidence of diagnosed diabetes was 9. Incidence Among Children and Adolescents Data from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study indicated that, during —, the estimated annual number of newly diagnosed cases in the United States included: 18, children and adolescents younger than age 20 years with type 1 diabetes.

: Prediabetes statistics

Diabetes in New York State	Nonetheless, extensive extrapolation for sparse or missing data are required for generating global estimates for any health condition 27 , Copy to clipboard. Prediabetes can be reversed with lifestyle changes including healthy eating and physical activity. No part of this report has ever been published in any journal. Table 2 Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents Full size table. Undiagnosed diabetes was based on fasting plasma glucose and A1C levels among people self-reporting no diabetes.
Prediabetes Trends Among U.S. Adults	PLoS ONE. Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar. Hauguel-Moreau M, Aïdan V, Hergault H, Beauchet A, Pépin M, Prati G, et al. Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia in patients presenting with premature acute coronary syndrome. Arch Cardiovasc Dis févr. Hauguel-Moreau M, Pépin M, Hergault H, Beauchet A, Mustafic H, Karam C, et al. Long-term changes of the cardiovascular risk factors and risk scores in a large urban population. Eur J Prev Cardiol. Google Scholar. Pépin M, Hauguel-Moreau M, Hergault H, Beauchet A, Rodon C, Cudennec T, et al. Relevance of cardiovascular risk factors screening in people aged over 65 years: results from a large French urban population The CARVAR92 Study. Gerontology ;1—8. Hergault H, Hauguel-Moreau M, Pépin M, Beauchet A, Josseran L, Rodon C, et al. impact of neighborhood socioeconomic status on cardiovascular risk factors in a French urban population. World Health Organization, International Diabetes Federation. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V, Bailey CJ, Ceriello A, Delgado V, et al. Eur Heart J. Article PubMed Google Scholar. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Conroy RM, Pyörälä K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar. Vistisen D, Witte DR, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M, Tabák A, Jørgensen ME, et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease and death in individuals with prediabetes defined by different criteria: the Whitehall II study. Diabetes Care. Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar. Tabák AG, Herder C, Rathmann W, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M. Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development. Moody A, Cowley G, Ng Fat L, Mindell JS. Social inequalities in prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in participants in the Health Surveys for England series. BMJ Open. Bocquet V, Ruiz-Castell M, de Beaufort C, Barré J, de Rekeneire N, Michel G, et al. Public health burden of pre-diabetes and diabetes in Luxembourg: finding from the — European Health Examination Survey. Kim D, Li AA, Cholankeril G, Kim SH, Ingelsson E, Knowles JW, et al. Trends in overall, cardiovascular and cancer-related mortality among individuals with diabetes reported on death certificates in the United States between and Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC. Prevalence of and trends in diabetes among adults in the United States, — Ruiz PLD, Stene LC, Bakken IJ, Håberg SE, Birkeland KI, Gulseth HL. Decreasing incidence of pharmacologically and non-pharmacologically treated type 2 diabetes in Norway: a nationwide study. Carstensen B, Kristensen JK, Ottosen P, Borch-Johnsen K, Steering Group of the National Diabetes Register. The Danish National Diabetes Register: trends in incidence, prevalence and mortality. Gardete-Correia L, Boavida JM, Raposo JF, Mesquita AC, Fona C, Carvalho R, et al. First diabetes prevalence study in Portugal: PREVADIAB study. Diabet Med. Kim SM, Lee JS, Lee J, Na JK, Han JH, Yoon DK, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Korea: Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey Fuentes S, Mandereau-Bruno L, Regnault N, Bernillon P, Bonaldi C, Cosson E, et al. Is the type 2 diabetes epidemic plateauing in France? A nationwide population-based study. Diabetes Metab. Benoit SR, Hora I, Albright AL, Gregg EW. New directions in incidence and prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in the USA. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. Jansson SPO, Fall K, Brus O, Magnuson A, Wändell P, Östgren CJ, et al. Prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus: a nationwide population-based pharmaco-epidemiological study in Sweden. Download references. We kindly thank the municipalities and medical teams from our partner cities Antony, Asnières-sur-Seine, Bagneux, Châtenay-Malabry, Colombes, Fontenay-aux-Roses, Gennevilliers, Issy-les-Moulineaux, Le Plessis-Robinson, Montrouge, Nanterre, Foch Hospital in Suresnes, Neuilly-Courbevoie Hospital, Marie-Thérèse Health Center in Malakoff, and all physicians involved in the screening campaign. Department of Cardiology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP , Centre de Référence Des Cardiomyopathies Et Des Troubles du Rythme Cardiaque Héréditaires Ou Rares, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin UVSQ , ACTION Study Group, Paris, 9, Avenue Charles de Gaulle, , Boulogne-Billancourt, France. INSERM U, CESP, Épidémiologie clinique, UVSQ, Villejuif, France. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, UVSQ, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. Department of Geriatrics, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, UVSQ, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. Public Health Department, APHP, UVSQ, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. Local Health insurance, Hauts de Seine Department, Paris, France. Department of Nephrology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, AP-HP, UVSQ, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. MHM, NM, OD, AB contributed to the conception and design of the study. MHM, MO, AB contributed to the acquisition and interpretation of the work. MHM, AB contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data. MHM drafted the manuscript. HH, LC, MP, ZM, OD, NM, CR, LJ critically revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval of the article and agree to be accountable for all aspects of work ensuring integrity and accuracy. Correspondence to Marie Hauguel-Moreau. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Characteristics of subjects with prediabetes according to the definition of prediabetes WHO versus ADA criteria. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. Reprints and permissions. Hauguel-Moreau, M. et al. Prevalence of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in a large urban middle-aged population: the CARVAR 92 cohort. Cardiovasc Diabetol 22 , 31 Download citation. Received : 29 December Accepted : 03 February Published : 13 February Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search all BMC articles Search. Download PDF. Download ePub. Abstract Background The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of prediabetes and unknown diabetes and its long-term change in a large middle-aged urban population. Methods We conducted a screening campaign between and for cardiovascular risk factors in the western suburbs of Paris including subjects aged 40—70 CARVAR Results Of the 32, subjects in the CARVAR 92 cohort, 32, were included in this analysis. Conclusion The prevalence of prediabetes and unknown diabetes remains high but decreased during a year period. Trial registration : IRB Introduction Diabetes mellitus is a major public health issue with a global prevalence estimated at 9. Methods Study population Between January and December , we conducted a cardiovascular risk factor screening campaign in the western suburbs of Paris the CARVAR 92 study. Definitions of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes Among subjects who reported no previous diabetes mellitus, prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes were defined according to World Health Organization WHO criteria [ 9 ]: 6. Cardiovascular risk factors and year risk for CVD Known diabetes mellitus was defined as patients with a diagnosis of diabetes treated or not performed before the screening campaign [ 10 ]. Results Between January and December , 32, subjects were included prospectively in the CARVAR 92 screening campaign. Table 1 Characteristics of subjects according to their diabetic status Full size table. Study flow chart. Full size image. Table 2 Weighted prevalence of prediabetes, unknown diabetes and previous diabetes according to age and sex Full size table. Table 3 Weighted prevalence of prediabetes, unknown diabetes and previous diabetes according to body mass index and sex Full size table. Discussion In this large middle-aged French cohort, we observed a prevalence of 8. Conclusion Our results show that the prevalence of prediabetes and unknown diabetes is high, but is decreasing in France over a year period, and about one-quarter of diabetes cases remain undiagnosed. References Home, Resources, diabetes L with, Acknowledgement, FAQs, Contact, et al. Article Google Scholar Karam C, Beauchet A, Czernichow S, de Roquefeuil F, Bourez A, Mansencal N, et al. Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar Hauguel-Moreau M, Aïdan V, Hergault H, Beauchet A, Pépin M, Prati G, et al. Article Google Scholar Hauguel-Moreau M, Pépin M, Hergault H, Beauchet A, Mustafic H, Karam C, et al. Google Scholar Pépin M, Hauguel-Moreau M, Hergault H, Beauchet A, Rodon C, Cudennec T, et al. Article PubMed Google Scholar Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. Article PubMed Google Scholar Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. Article PubMed Google Scholar Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, Albus C, Brotons C, Catapano AL, et al. Article PubMed Google Scholar Conroy RM, Pyörälä K, Fitzgerald AP, Sans S, Menotti A, De Backer G, et al. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Vistisen D, Witte DR, Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M, Tabák A, Jørgensen ME, et al. We used logistic regression to generate prevalence estimates for IGT and IFG among adults aged years in and projections for For countries without in-country data, we extrapolated estimates from countries with available data with similar geography, income, ethnicity, and language. Estimates were standardized to the age distribution for each country from the United Nations. Results: Approximately two-thirds of countries did not have high-quality IGT or IFG data. There were 50 high-quality studies for IGT from 43 countries and 43 high-quality studies for IFG from 40 countries. Eleven countries had data for both IGT and IFG. The global prevalence of IGT in was 9. The global prevalence of IFG in was 5. The prevalence of IGT and IFG was highest in high-income countries.
Diagnosed prediabetes adults share by U.S. state | Statista	International Expert Committee. Another limitation of the study was ensuring fasting status of the participants in the early morning. Joinpoint identified in see Appendix B: Detailed Methods and Data Sources. In a randomized pilot trial by Laura R Saslow and colleagues it was shown that very low carbohydrate ketogenic diet was more favorable in reducing the risk of prediabetes than moderate carbohydrate diets[ 25 ]. Forty-six 0. Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar Carstensen B, Kristensen JK, Ottosen P, Borch-Johnsen K, Steering Group of the National Diabetes Register.
Related CE	The global prevalence of Predianetes in was Preidabetes. View Prediabetes statistics. About one-third of US sattistics had Prediabetes statistics over the entire period. There is an urgent need for effective strategies that can prevent diabetes progression in low-income settings, such as community-based and group-based lifestyle interventions using lay personnel A nationwide population-based study.

Sttaistics Public Health volume atatisticsAppetite suppressant for women number: Cite this article. Prediabetes statistics details. Preddiabetes rural Uganda a Prediabetes statistics number Prediabetes statistics persons afflicted with pre-diabetes are unaware of the condition. This is likely to lead to diabetic complications resulting in catastrophic health expendirure. The burden of prediabetes in rural Isingiro has not previously been determined. This study examined the prevalence of prediabetes and the associated factors among rural community members.

Prediabetes statistics -

Navigation menu. Section Menu Learn More Diabetes Basics Prediabetes Preventing Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes Data and Statistics Diabetes Information and Resources Diabetes Home. Diabetes and Diabetes Prevention Diabetes is a chronic disease in which blood sugar glucose levels are above normal.

Diabetes in New York State An estimated 1. The good news is that people can prevent or delay type 2 diabetes by: Participating in a CDC-recognized diabetes prevention lifestyle change program NDPP to learn skills and get resources to help make healthy changes Losing small amounts of weight 5 to 7 percent of total body weight Making healthy food choices Being more physically active, minutes per week There are many resources available to help people find out if they are at risk for prediabetes, and to help people with prediabetes prevent or delay diabetes: To find out if you or a loved one are at risk for prediabetes, take the online risk test Are you a health care provider who wants more information on how to diagnose patients with prediabetes?

Visit the American Medical Association and the Centers for Disease Control Prevent Diabetes STAT Toolkit for more information Learn more about the National Diabetes Prevention Program near you: CDC Diabetes Prevention Programs For More Information, Contact: The New York State Diabetes Prevention and Control Program Broadway — Suite Albany NY Phone: E-mail: ManageYourHealthNY health.

gov Additional Resources New York State Department of Health Recognizes World Diabetes Day: Highlighting the Importance of Screening for A Disease Devastating Millions References: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.

Dept of Health and Human Services; Available at: National Diabetes Statistics Report Estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States.

gov Prediabetes, New York State Adults, BRFSS Brief. Albany, New York: New York State Department of Health, Division of Chronic Disease Prevention. Bureau of Chronic Disease Evaluation and Research, Available at: BRFSS Prediabetes.

Questions or comments: ManageYourHealthNY health. Department of Health General Information James V. Conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Eligible data sources included population-based studies national or regional , registries, or insurance-based data on adults Supplementary Table 1.

Only studies published in English were included in the initial literature search and extraction process, but a later search of publications in non-English languages Spanish, French, Portuguese, and Russian was conducted, where possible, via the IDF network.

In addition to peer-reviewed publications, we considered national estimates from the gray literature, including WHO STEPwise approach to noncommunicable disease risk factor surveillance STEPS survey reports, in the estimation process.

We also contacted ministries of health and all IDF regional partners for unpublished data related to IFG and IGT. Data sources reporting prediabetes in hospital or clinic populations, occupational cohorts, or other specific populations e.

Newly identified studies were combined with previous IDF data for IGT. Only estimates of prediabetes prevalence after were included in the estimation, except for countries whose only data predated Data sources that included three or more age-stratified estimates of IFG or IGT were required for the analysis.

Where age-specific data were not reported in the original publication, we reached out to study authors for this information. Newly identified studies and previous IDF data sources were scored for quality using the Analytical Hierarchy Process 12 , The data source was scored according to national representativeness, diagnostic criteria, sample size, year of data source, etc.

Only studies that met the 0. When more than one study met the threshold, study estimates were weighted for sample size. Using established methods developed by the IDF 15 , we estimated the global prevalence of prediabetes based on WHO definitions of IFG and IGT.

Briefly, we built separate logistic regression models to produce smoothed prevalence estimates of IGT and IFG. The models included adjustment for age modeled continuously using the midpoint of each available age group and the quadratic of age. We ran models stratified by sex male or female , setting urban or rural , and age adults aged 20—79 years, 5-year increments category—specific estimates.

Prevalence estimates for IGT and IFG were standardized to the age distribution for each country from the United Nations 15 , For countries without high-quality in-country data, we used methods established by the IDF to extrapolate prevalence estimates from countries deemed to be similar based on geography, IDF region, ethnicity, language, and World Bank income classification IDF selected these measures to guide extrapolation based on extensive discussions and consensus from experts around the world.

For studies that did not report results stratified by urbanization, urban and rural ratios were calculated according to the weighted average of the ratios reported in various data sources from the seven IDF regions and the four World Bank income classifications Using standard IDF methods 15 , we estimated CI for each IGT and IFG prevalence estimate separately for each country using a process that included 1 a simulation analysis to estimate uncertainty for each study and 2 a jackknife analysis to estimate uncertainty due to study inclusion.

The simulation analysis involved production of random samples from a binomial distribution to produce lower and upper bounds, which represent the confidence intervals. The jackknife analysis involved 1, iterations. In each loop, a study was randomly removed from the data set and the global prevalence was estimated.

CI for each estimate of IGT and of IFG prevalence were identified using the lower and upper bound for each age group, sex, and country. The lower and upper bounds from the simulation and jackknife analyses were combined to produce the widest overall CI We derived the projections of IGT and IFG prevalence estimates in using data from the United Nations on midyear population projections Future projections were calculated using the United Nations population predictions for age, sex, and urbanization urban-to-rural ratio.

Analyses were performed using R software version 4. Graphics were generated using Microsoft Excel. We screened 7, articles as part of the literature review. Of the world countries and territories, 43 countries Only 11 countries 4. In , the age-adjusted prevalence of IGT among adults aged 20—79 years worldwide was 9.

In , 5. Age-adjusted prevalence of IGT and IGT for each country and territory worldwide with extrapolation for countries without in-country data are available in Supplementary Table 2.

CI are reported in parentheses. IGT was defined as 2-h postload glucose levels of 7. IFG was defined as fasting plasma glucose levels of 6.

AFR, Africa; EUR, Europe; MENA, Middle East and North Africa; NAC, North America and Caribbean; SACA, South and Central America; SEA, Southeast Asia; WP, Western Pacific. The age-adjusted prevalence of IGT in was highest in the North America and Caribbean regions Southeast Asia 9.

The proportion of adults with IGT increased significantly with age Fig. By , the prevalence of IGT is projected to grow in adults aged 20—74 years but slightly decline among those aged 75—79 years.

The prevalence of IFG in was higher in older age, peaking among adults aged 60—64 years at 7. By the year , the global prevalence of IFG in adults is projected to increase across most age categories, but the prevalence of IFG among adults aged 75—79 years is projected to be similar to that in Prevalence of IGT A and IFG B in adults aged 20—79 years in and by age group.

Across World Bank income classification categories, the age-adjusted IGT prevalence in was highest for high-income countries For IFG, the age-adjusted prevalence estimates in were highest among high-income countries 6. The age-adjusted prevalence of IFG and IGT is projected to increase across all income classification categories, with the largest relative growth in the number of people with prediabetes occurring in low-income countries.

The prevalence of IGT and IFG in was similar for males and females Supplementary Fig. IGT was more common in urban vs.

rural areas in , but the prevalence of IFG did not differ across setting Supplementary Fig. In , the age-adjusted prevalence of IGT and IFG was 9.

The prevalence estimates for both IGT and IFG rose substantially with increasing age. The prevalence estimates for both IGT and IFG were highest in high-income countries, with the largest relative growth in the number of people in with IGT and IFG occurring in low-income countries.

By , the global prevalence of IGT and IFG is projected to increase to Our estimate of the global prevalence of IGT was consistent with previous estimates.

Atlas 9 estimated the age-adjusted global prevalence to be 8. This difference indicates a small increase in the global prevalence of IGT from to Additionally, our analysis and Atlas 9 used a different set of studies to generate global estimates of IGT, which may limit direct comparison.

The growing burden of prediabetes underscores the importance of effectively implementing diabetes prevention policies and interventions. In the U. Similar programs have been created in other high-income and middle-income countries 10 , 20 , However, lower-income countries are less likely to have the resources, personnel, and public health and health care infrastructure needed to implement and maintain these efforts at a national level.

There is an urgent need for effective strategies that can prevent diabetes progression in low-income settings, such as community-based and group-based lifestyle interventions using lay personnel Other diabetes prevention strategies could be addressed through population-level changes in public health policy e.

This is particularly important because these countries are expected to have the largest relative growth in prediabetes prevalence over the next 25 years.

It is not clear whether these countries have the infrastructure to manage prediabetes cases and subsequent diabetes cases and the complications that may follow. Urbanization is associated with an increased prevalence of obesity and diabetes Consistent with prior research, we found that the prevalence of IGT was higher in urban vs.

rural settings. The availability of global data on prediabetes in the literature was poor. We had high-quality data sources from 43 countries with which to generate estimates of IGT. We also provided the first global estimates of IFG based on high-quality information for 40 countries.

Overall, only about one-third of all countries had high-quality data for IFG or IGT. This highlights the need for improvements in population surveillance for prediabetes, especially in low-income settings, where few data were available.

Continuing and expanding global surveillance efforts, such as the WHO STEPS surveys, can help to provide data to fill this gap. Our study provides a comprehensive assessment of the global burden of prediabetes by including data on both IGT and IFG.

We systematically reviewed and extracted data from over 7, published articles and used rigorous methods to estimate prevalence. We also attempted to source data from the gray literature by way of contacting ministries of health and regional partners and requesting data. The limitations of our systematic review reflect those of the existing literature on prediabetes.

First, the studies included in our analyses had considerable differences in population, sampling methodology, and date or period of data collection. We sought to reduce this heterogeneity by analyzing contemporary, high-quality studies. Nonetheless, these methodological differences likely influenced the comparability of estimates across countries.

Second, we only examined two definitions of prediabetes IGT and IFG based on the WHO criteria. Currently, there is no consensus definition of prediabetes.

There are at least five different definitions endorsed by different professional organizations and guidelines based on fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, or HbA 1c 1.

Studies that reported only the American Diabetes Association ADA criteria for IFG were not considered in this report.

The prevalence of IFG based on ADA criteria 5. We also did not estimate the prevalence of prediabetes defined by HbA 1c due to the limited availability of prediabetes defined by HbA 1c in the international scientific literature. Broadening the use of HbA 1c testing may be useful for improving global surveillance efforts on prediabetes, as HbA 1c is a non—fasting test no participant preparation is required and can be convenient for large-scale surveys and thus population surveillance.

Third, we considered the prevalence of IGT and IFG separately, as studies rarely had both measures available; however, the overlap between the IFG and IGT populations may be limited 3. Fourth, our projections to are based on projected demographic changes in age and sex distribution and the urban-to-rural ratio and did not factor in changes in other important determinants of prediabetes, e.

Fifth, our extrapolation approach for missing data was informed by expert consensus but has not been formally validated. Nonetheless, extensive extrapolation for sparse or missing data are required for generating global estimates for any health condition 27 , Lastly, publications that were published after our initial search for the IDF Diabetes Atlas , 10th edition, were not considered.

In conclusion, the global burden of prediabetes based on WHO definitions of IFG and IGT is substantial and growing. Effective prevention, especially in low-income countries, is needed to slow the diabetes epidemic. High-quality data, which are currently unavailable for approximately two-thirds of countries worldwide, will be critical for global surveillance efforts.

Reaching consensus definitions for prediabetes will facilitate comparisons of prevalence estimates across regions and time. Our findings highlight opportunities for improved epidemiologic surveillance of prediabetes and the need for improved efforts to reduce its global burden.

The authors thank all those who have supported the production of the IDF Diabetes Atlas , 10th edition, by providing additional diabetes data where needed. We thank Professors Agus Salim and Baker Heart and the Diabetes Institute Australia for reviewing the statistical methodology employed in this edition.

We also thank all our collaborators from Johns Hopkins University: Daisy Duan, Kathryn Foti, Fernando Mijares Diaz, Olive Tang, Amelia Wallace, Sui Zhang, and Dan Wang for their involvement in the abstract and full-text reviews.

The IDF Diabetes Atlas , 10th edition, was supported by an educational grant from the Pfizer-MSD Alliance, with the additional support of Sanofi and Novo Nordisk. Duality of Interest. is an associate editor at Diabetes Care and recused herself from consideration of the manuscript.

No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported. Author Contributions. Authors made the following contributions: conception and design, M.

and M. are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Prior Presentation. Parts of this work were presented in abstract form at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, 19—23 September Sign In or Create an Account.

Search Dropdown Menu. header search search input Search input auto suggest. filter your search All Content All Journals Diabetes Care. Advanced Search.

Diabetes mellitus is a term for Stafistics group of disorders Quercetin and skin health cause elevated blood Prediabehes glucose levels in the statistice. Prediabetes statistics Prediabeyes eat, your body breaks down carbohydrates into Prediabetes statistics. This leads to symptoms of diabetes. It can increase the risk of:. Treatment may include taking insulin or other medications. According to the American Diabetes Association ADApeople who develop non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus type 2 diabetes nearly always have prediabetes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC estimates 88 million adult Americans have prediabetes, and more than 84 percent go undiagnosed.